· Public charity
Credit Unions in the State of Washington
As a cooperative we bring people together to improve the financial well-being of our members and their communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 192 grants below total $9,630,734 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,910,569 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $279,835 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k58 grants · $315k
- $10k–50k102 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k26 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+6 grants · $4.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BECU FOUNDATION | $2,292,848 |
| AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC | $1,150,000 |
| FRIENDS OF KEXP | $543,351 |
| SEATTLE FOUNDATION | $325,000 |
| EXPRESS CREDIT UNION | $300,000 |
| BUSINESS IMPACT NW | $278,000 |
| NATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION INC | $210,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON | $205,000 |
| WSU FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION | $170,000 |
| DENKYEM SPC | $150,000 |
| AFRICAN AMERICAN CREDIT UNION COALITION | $115,000 |
| FAMILY FIRST COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION | $107,500 |
| INTENTIONALIST SPC | $106,000 |
| POSSIBILITY LABS | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
185 repeat relationships — 126 still active in FY2024, 59 since wound down; 61 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBECU FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $8.3M · revenue +232% · 78% of their budget
- CUCREDIT UNIONS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON6× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +91% · 41% of their budget
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +42%
Funded once
- WIWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR FINANCIAL SECURITYone grant, 2018 · $206k · revenue -19% · 34% of their budget
- WSWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2021 · $190k
- BIBEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INCone grant, 2018 · $157k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.
Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.
House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
We Heart Seattle is an action-based, boots-on-the-ground movement that organizes trash cleanups in our public spaces and offers resources to those in need. Through our direct civic engagement we lead the way to a more compassionate and…
The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…
Washingtonians for Public banking promotes education and civic engagement on public banking and banking reform within Washington state. The organization organizes, educates, and advocates for the establishment of public banking, and…
To achieve economic fairness in order to establish a more democratic society characterized by racial, social & gender justice, with respect for diversity, & a decent quality of life for those who reside in WA. We are building a movement of…
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Washington Progress Fund is building a permanent and powerful social change movement in Washington state supported by a network of committed donors. WPF envisions a Washington state where government serves the public interest and we all…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Tomorrow and the most unlike its peers is America's Credit Union Museum Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
400 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 400 of the 458 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BECU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CREDIT UNIONS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BUSINESS IMPACT NW ↗
- Who funds HOUSING HOPE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KEXP ↗
- Who funds SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GOWEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN CREDIT UNION COALITION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FORTERRA NW ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Seattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds YOUR MONEY MATTERS ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INNOVATION RESOURCE CTR ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FIRST COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR FINANCIAL SECURITY ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Lowcountry ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
- Who funds Eastern Washington University Foundation ↗
- Who funds MOTHER AFRICA ↗
- Who funds FINANCIAL BEGINNINGS WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Rebuilding Together South Sound ↗
- Who funds BEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · School's Out Washington · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Inatai Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · Lucky Seven Foundation · Multicare Health System
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Credit Unions in the State of Washington funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Financial Beginnings — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.