· Public charity
Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company
To proactively involve boeing employees in support of community services where they live and work.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 264 grants below total $5,038,583 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,768,774 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $730,191 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k52 grants · $372k
- $10k–50k196 grants · $3.6M
- $50k–250k15 grants · $775k
- $250k+1 grant · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK | $320,000 |
| SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION | $75,000 |
| BONNEY LAKE COMMUNITY RESOURCES | $50,000 |
| SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| WEST SEATTLE FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| TERRY HOME | $50,000 |
| WONDERLAND CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES | $50,000 |
| WHATCOM FAMILY YMCA | $50,000 |
| BABIES OF HOMELESSNESS | $50,000 |
| SKAGIT GLEANERS | $50,000 |
| ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME | $50,000 |
| SOUTH PUGET SOUND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $50,000 |
| EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS | $50,000 |
| EDMONDS FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KITSAP COUNTY | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
294 repeat relationships — 150 still active in FY2024, 144 since wound down; 111 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EREVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS2× · 2022–2024 · $550k · revenue +3%
- MCMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER2× · 2020–2023 · $536k · revenue +453%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY2× · 2020–2023 · $325k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- HHHOUSING HOPEone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -13%
- HSHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISESone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +25%
- CFCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESSone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.
Family solutions is a community based, comprehensive behavioral health provider cultivating the wellness of southwest washington by offering hope and health to children, youth and families.
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.
Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.
To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…
The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
Behavioral health, long-term support services, mental health therapy, substance, alcohol and drug abuse treatment as well as domestic violence offender intervention services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live and Learn Program and the most unlike its peers is St Lou Fringe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
797 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 797 of the 827 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BALLARD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HOUSING HOPE ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BELLWETHER HOUSING ↗
- Who funds WHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds CASA LATINA ↗
- Who funds CHILDSTRIVE ↗
- Who funds BYRD BARR PLACE ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NETWORK SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
- Who funds Chinese Information and Service Center ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds FAMILYWORKS ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
- Who funds GoodRoots Northwest ↗
- Who funds LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SEATTLE WOMENS HEALTH FOUNDAT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Pott Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Employees Community Fund of Boeing California Inc · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Antfarm Inc — 29% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company?
Find your warmest path to Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.