Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Purple Crayon Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$783k
Granted FY2021
20
Grants FY2021
14
Organizations funded FY2021
93%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2021
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$250,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 14
FY2019 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
7
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 93% of the organizations Purple Crayon Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 97% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $733k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Arts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202114$753k93%
FY20202$21k0%
FY20194$40kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Education$600kInternational$71kPublic Benefit$70kArts & Culture$43kEnvironment$40kPhilanthropy$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Purple Crayon Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Washington Foundation$450,00010%
Minority Veterans of America$55,000112%
Washington State University Foundation$50,00010%
Technology Access Foundation$50,00011%
Peacetrees Vietnam$32,60221%
Global Partnerships$25,00020%
National Oldtime Fiddlers Inc$15,750111%
Pink Berets$15,0001n/a
The Trust for Public Land$14,00010%
Uplift International Inc$13,0002n/a
The Ibma Foundation Inc$10,75013%
Caura Futures Inc$10,00014%
Washington Wild$5,75011%
Northwest Folklife$3,99810%
American Banjo Museum Inc$2,00010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($61k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Purple Crayon Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $450,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMinority Veterans of America: $55,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWashington State University Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTechnology Access Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPeacetrees Vietnam: $32,602 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGlobal Partnerships: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNational Oldtime Fiddlers Inc: $15,750 over 1y, 11% of budgetThe Trust for Public Land: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ibma Foundation Inc: $10,750 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCaura Futures Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetWashington Wild: $5,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNorthwest Folklife: $3,998 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Banjo Museum Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Purple Crayon Foundation with peer funders

About Purple Crayon Foundation

How much does Purple Crayon Foundation give?
Purple Crayon Foundation reported 20 grants totaling $782,998 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 14 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2021.
What does Purple Crayon Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2021, its largest causes are Education (71%), International (8%), Public Benefit (8%).
Who are Purple Crayon Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2021: University of Washington Foundation ($450k), Minority Veterans of America ($55k), Washington State University Foundation ($50k).
Does Purple Crayon Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 93% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Purple Crayon Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Purple Crayon Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Seattle Foundation, Impactassetsinc, Network for Good.
Where is Purple Crayon Foundation based?
Purple Crayon Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Purple Crayon’s filings →

More from the funding graph