Loading…
Loading…
Arizona · Nonprofit
Sunshine Rescue Mission (Arizona) is funded by 23 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $408,783 in grants to it, the largest being ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($103,113). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Sunshine Rescue Mission is better cushioned than half of the 2,233 religion nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,233 religion nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
$2k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $14k and 4 in 2017.
9 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 58% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Sunshine Rescue Mission’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 22 of 23 funders by total. Association, not causation.
Sunshine Rescue Mission has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 70% · 2018 66% · 2019 47% · 2020 35% · 2021 55% · 2022 30% · 2023 28% · 2024 70% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
22% of Sunshine Rescue Mission's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
Sunshine Rescue Mission is locally rooted: 57% of its grant income comes from Arizona funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 23 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
84% of spending goes to programs.
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 23funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing