· Private foundation
The Haugh Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $12,500 |
| MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN | $8,000 |
| COMMUNITY HOME REPAIR PROJECTS | $5,000 |
| SISTER JOSE WOMEN'S CENTER | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHAB SVCS | $4,000 |
| YOUTH ON THEIR OWN | $4,000 |
| TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS | $3,500 |
| PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $2,500 |
| EL RIO HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,500 |
| IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HUBBELL TRADING POST | $2,000 |
| CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS | $2,000 |
| GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YOYOUTH ON THEIR OWN7× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +138%
- TPThe Primavera Foundation Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +54%
- TMTHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- ARAmerican Red Crossone grant, 2017 · $5k
- SASan Agnacio Yaquyi Councilone grant, 2017 · $5k
- HSHumane Society of Southern Arizonagraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.
To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.
The vision of desert senita community health center states: your center for healing and wellness. the mission is quality, local, affordable healthcare for all. desert senita community health center is the sole provider of primary medical,…
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
Since 1957, SRM has provided safe emergency shelter, meals, and clothing to anyone in need. All participants are experiencing homelessness and living below the federal poverty line at intake. Located in Flagstaff, we have three facilities.…
A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.
The Tucson Investigative Reporting Center educates and informs Southern Arizonans about the community challenges & unique culture of our borderlands through independent local journalism.
The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Community Services and the most unlike its peers is Marshall Home for Men Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
- Who funds The Primavera Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Casa Esperanza Para Ninos ↗
- Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds Marshall Home for Men INC ↗
- Who funds TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
- Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
- Who funds Southern Arizona AIDS Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Equine Voices Rescue & Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds BEACON GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HUBBELL TRADING POST ↗
- Who funds IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The Kai Family Foundation · The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Intuit Foundation · Elizabeth Read Taylor Foundation · Ashton Family Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Marshall Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Haugh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Haugh Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Haugh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.