Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Narbha Institute Inc

Serve medicaid managed care subcontract, supported housing for mentally ill, convener/supporter in health/social determinants.

$8.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
59
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$22MEducation$4.2MHuman Services$1.6MPublic Benefit$955kCommunity Improvement$836kHousing & Shelter$530kFood & Nutrition$282kPhilanthropy$249kOther$0
02FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 59 grants below total $7,685,424 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,106,045 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $420,621 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $661k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+8 grants · $5.1M
$35,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$75M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOHAVE MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC INC$1,349,521
NORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE$900,000
SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC$654,080
CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH$649,716
COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC$517,321
WEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC DBA POLARA$434,684
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$364,950
THE GUIDANCE CENTER$279,653
SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC$238,683
AZ THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER$150,000
SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC$137,738
COCONINO COMM COLLEGE FOUNDATION$110,500
HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA$109,772
FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER$104,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZ$103,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AYUNDA SMILES INC: $6k → 15%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH: $1.1M → 26%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH: $650k → 26%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH INC (N 85000 AND JV 534): $86k → 26%Matforce (JV): $32k → 14%Changepoint Integrated Health Inc (JV): $72k → 26%Catholic Charities Community Services Inc (JV): $50k → 11%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH: $6k → 26%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $60k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $60k → 28%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CTR: $60k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $40k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $30k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $30k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC (JV): $30k → 28%hope lives - vive le esperanza (JV): $18k → 11%Old Concho Community Assistance Center Inc (JV): $9k → 28%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $53k → 14%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $25k → 14%HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $110k → 11%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $10k → 14%HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $64k → 11%HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $61k → 11%CORNUCOPIA COMMUNITY ADVOCATES (N): $24k → 14%HOPE LIVES-VIVE LA EXPERANZA: $50k → 11%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $6k → 14%COCONINO COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $27k → 16%CORNUCOPIA COMMUNITY ADVOCATES: $8k → 14%HOPE LIVES - VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $24k → 11%HOPE LIVES-VIVE LA EXPERANZA: $11k → 11%Victim Witness Services for Coconino County (JV): $25k → 16%COCONINO COALITION FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH: $10k → 16%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $50k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $20k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED (JV): $20k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $20k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $10k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $200k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $193k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $100k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $100k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $100k → 11%family involvement center (JV): $37k → 11%FAMILY INVOLVEMENT CENTER INC: $24k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MT
NY
MA
PA
CA
AZ
NM
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30M · 63 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

63 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
31

Total granted

$30M
$689k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+35%

Still filing today

78%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $437k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +21%
  • TT
    THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $2.7M · revenue +11%
  • NA
    NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +337%

Funded once

  • BH
    Banner Health Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +52%
  • WA
    WESTCARE ARIZONA I INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $59k · revenue +51%
  • AF
    ARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE OF NURSING INC
    one grant, 2022 · $56k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
2
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
3
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
4
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
5
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
6
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
7
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
8
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Arizona Public Health Association

A nonprofit professional organization working to improve the health of Arizona communities through advocacy, education, and professional development.

Health
11
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
12
Native Health

To provide accessible holistic patient centered care, to empower our community to achieve the highest quality health and well-being.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az and the most unlike its peers is Sitgreaves Community Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySupportive Housing & Servic…Youth Development & Support…Arizona Youth and Conservat…Performing Arts Education &…Community Service Organizat…Professional Trade Associat…Family FoundationsHealthcare Industry Associa…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%6%<5yr17%7%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr14%27%20–35yr10%22%35–55yr11%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%7%<5yr17%4%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr10%29%35–55yr11%39%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%3/109
the rest of the field
17%
3,251/19,578

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/90
Grantees still filing
51/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mohave Mental Health Clinic Inc — $4,085,905 · HealthMohave Mental Health Clinic IncTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $2,670,000 · HealthTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTESOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $2,479,281 · HealthSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INCWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC — $1,563,749 · HealthWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INCCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC — $1,493,271 · HealthCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC+19 more — $1,163,606 · Health+19 moreNORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC — $3,350,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INCSPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC — $1,226,049 · OtherSPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INCTHE GUIDANCE CENTER INC — $995,424 · OtherTHE GUIDANCE CENTER INCNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY — $698,817 · OtherNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITYCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF YAVAPAI — $316,600 · OtherWILLIAMS HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF COCONINO COUNTY — $316,421 · Other+48 more — $2,570,317 · Other+48 moreChangePoint Integrated Health — $1,955,692 · Human ServicesChangePoint I…HUSHABYE NURSERY — $692,944 · Human ServicesHUSHABYE NURS…Hope Lives Vive La Esperanza — $337,320 · Human ServicesHope Lives Vi…OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CEN — $318,545 · Human ServicesOLD CONCHO CO…+10 more — $476,786 · Human Services+10 moreNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $2,628,934 · EducationNORTHERN A…COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $195,000 · EducationCOCONINO C…+6 more — $111,000 · EducationLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $500,000 · Community ImprovementCoconino County Sustainable Economic Development Initiative — $460,710 · Community ImprovementWESTCARE ARIZONA I INC — $59,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $35,800 · Community ImprovementFIRST PLACE AZ — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC — $88,000 · Housing & ShelterRED FEATHER DEVELOPMENT GROUP — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC — $249,350 · Philanthropy
Health$13,455,812Other$9,473,628Human Services$3,781,287Education$2,934,934Community Improvement$1,055,510Housing & Shelter$298,000Philanthropy$249,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMohave Mental Health Clinic Inc — $4,085,905 over 4y, 11% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC — $3,350,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $2,670,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $2,628,934 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $2,479,281 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetChangePoint Integrated Health — $1,955,692 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC — $1,563,749 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC — $1,493,271 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC — $1,226,049 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTHE GUIDANCE CENTER INC — $995,424 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY — $692,944 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCoconino County Sustainable Economic Development Initiative — $460,710 over 8y, 100% of budgetHope Lives Vive La Esperanza — $337,320 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetOLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CEN — $318,545 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetFLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER — $281,600 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetARIZONA THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER — $250,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC — $249,350 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetFIRST PLACE AZ — $200,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHEALTH CURRENT — $195,323 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $195,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetNAMI ARIZONA — $133,582 over 6y, 21% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT — $127,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE COLORADO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS INC — $125,133 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHELPING FAMILIES IN NEED — $120,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY AWARENESS RESOURCE ENTITY OF ARIZONA — $117,850 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetStarfish Partnerships Corporation — $100,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSunshine Rescue Mission — $100,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetGRAND CANYON YOUTH INC — $95,756 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA — $95,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES — $93,300 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetMIKID-Mentally Ill Kids in Distress — $89,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFLAGSTAFF SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $88,050 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC — $88,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA — $76,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER — $61,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY INVOLVEMENT CENTER INC — $60,292 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCARE ARIZONA I INC — $59,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE OF NURSING INC — $56,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCENTER FOR THE RIGHTS OF ABUSED CHILDREN — $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FLAGSTAFF — $45,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $40,840 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOMKIDZ INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetVITALYST HEALTH FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOCONINO COALITION FOR CHILDREN — $36,835 over 2y, 11% of budgetJerry Ambrose Veterans Council of Mohave County — $35,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mohave Mental Health Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ChangePoint Integrated Health ↗
  • Who funds WEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUSHABYE NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Coconino County Sustainable Economic Development Initiative ↗
  • Who funds Hope Lives Vive La Esperanza ↗
  • Who funds OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CEN ↗
  • Who funds FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE AZ ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CURRENT ↗
  • Who funds COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAMI ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE COLORADO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AWARENESS RESOURCE ENTITY OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds Starfish Partnerships Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Banner Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Sunshine Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES ↗
  • Who funds MIKID-Mentally Ill Kids in Distress ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Health First Foundati…Molly and Joseph Herm…Burton Family Foundat…The Foundation for Co…Virginia G Piper Char…Mercy CareThe Diane and Bruce H…United Way of Norther…Geile Charitable Foun…Delta Dental Plan of …St Mary's Food Bank A…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ85.8× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Health First Foundation-Northern Arizona · Molly and Joseph Herman Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Mercy Care · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · United Way of Northern Arizona Inc · Geile Charitable Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Arizona Charitable Foundation and Trust · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Narbha Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Narbha Institute Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Narbha Institute Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines