Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Margaret T Morris Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
112
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Arts & Culture$1.1MEducation$978kHealth$920kHuman Services$900kFood & Nutrition$472kYouth Development$470kHousing & Shelter$433kRecreation & Sports$327kOther$0
02FY2025 · 112 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $189k
  • $10k–50k56 grants · $954k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $604k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Arizona State University Foundation Gammage$100,000
Salk Institute$85,000
Polara Health$60,000
Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation$55,000
Prescott Mountain Bike Alliance$54,000
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University$50,000
Phoenix Art Museum$50,000
The University of Arizona Foundation$50,000
St Mary's Food Bank$50,000
Phoenix Zoo$50,000
Highlands Center for Natural History$45,000
Sharlot Hall Museum$35,000
Verde Valley Community Development Organization$32,500
Great Hearts Scottsdale Preparatory Academy$30,000
James Family Prescott YMCA$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $694k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Northland Hospice: $100k → 16%Easterseals Blake Foundation: $20k → 15%Easterseals Blake Foundation: $6k → 15%Northland Hospice: $5k → 16%Northland Hospice: $5k → 16%Circle the City: $25k → 11%Circle the City: $20k → 11%Circle the City: $20k → 11%Circle the City: $10k → 11%Prescott Free Clinic: $10k → 14%Arizona Autism United: $10k → 11%Arizona Autism United: $10k → 11%Prescott Free Clinic: $8k → 14%Arizona Autism United: $10k → 11%Arizona Autism United: $5k → 11%Prescott YMCA of Yavapai County: $105k → 14%Agape House of Prescott: $25k → 14%Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $100k → 11%Agape House of Prescott: $25k → 14%Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $55k → 11%Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $50k → 11%Prescott Meals on Wheels: $15k → 14%Prescott YMCA of Yavapai County: $10k → 14%Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation: $10k → 11%Prescott Meals on Wheels: $5k → 14%Arizonans for Children Inc: $10k → 11%Arizonans for Children Inc: $5k → 11%Arizonans for Children Inc: $5k → 11%Arizonans for Children Inc: $5k → 11%Arizona's Children Association: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 109 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

109 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
66

Total granted

$5.6M
$925k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+14%

Still filing today

72%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $360k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $190k · revenue +54%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $153k · revenue +32%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AC
    Arizona Community Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • TN
    The Nash Jazz in Arizona Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Clubs of Central AZ
    one grant, 2020 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
3
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
4
The Dons of Arizona
Education
5
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
6
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
7
Compass Training Center Az
Education
8
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
9
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
10
One Arizona

One arizonas mission is to increase civic participation among arizonans

Civil Rights
11
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
12
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is Yavapai County Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily & Youth Crisis Servi…Community Service Organizat…Private School Tuition Scho…Charter and Alternative Sch…Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity Health CentersPerforming Arts Organizatio…Family Homelessness & Trans…Jewish Community Organizati…Children's Health & Wellnes…Senior and Disability Resid…Food Banks & Hunger ReliefArizona Policy & Advocacy O…Hospital Foundation Networks
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%1%<5yr17%12%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr14%29%20–35yr10%23%35–55yr10%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%3%<5yr17%4%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr10%27%35–55yr10%28%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/117
the rest of the field
17%
3,102/18,361

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 204 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/112
Grantees still filing
59/112
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Salk Institute — $245,000 · OtherSalk InstituteArizona State University Foundation Gammage — $235,000 · OtherArizona State University Foundation GammageJames Family Prescott YMCA — $130,000 · Other+123 more — $2,880,942 · Other+123 moreArizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation — $215,000 · Human ServicesArizona Friend…Prescott YMCA of Yavapai County (0189) — $115,000 · Human ServicesPrescott YMCA …NORTHLAND HOSPICE — $110,000 · Human ServicesNORTHLAND HOSP…CIRCLE THE CITY — $75,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE THE CIT…Yavapai Food Bank Inc — $55,000 · Human ServicesYavapai Food B…YAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human ServicesYAVAPAI CASA F…AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE HOUSE OF…DETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA AUTISM UNITED INC — $35,000 · Human Services+6 more — $101,000 · Human Services+6 moreYAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $257,423 · EducationYAVAPAI COLL…EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $190,000 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE…University of Arizona Foundation — $150,000 · EducationUniversity o…Prescott Unified School District Education Found — $50,000 · EducationPrescott Uni…YAVAPAI COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $29,000 · Education+6 more — $62,500 · Education+6 moreRelease The Fear Inc — $110,000 · Arts & CultureRelease The…PHOENIX ART MUSEUM — $100,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX ART…THE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY — $51,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHOENIX…Arizona Citizens for the Arts — $45,000 · Arts & CultureArizona Cit…SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ — $45,000 · Arts & CultureSHARLOT HAL…CALA Alliance — $40,000 · Arts & CultureCALA Allian…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX — $40,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S …DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureDANCE THEAT…PHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $40,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX SYM…Arizona Theatre Company — $37,500 · Arts & CultureArizona The…ARIZONA OPERA COMPANY — $35,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDSPLAY INC — $30,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $86,500 · Arts & Culture+8 moreWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC — $184,500 · HealthWEST YAVA…Banner Health Foundation — $50,000 · HealthBanner He…A NEW LEAF — $50,000 · HealthA NEW LEA…FOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $40,000 · HealthFOUNDATIO…CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES — $38,600 · HealthCHILDREN'…CAMP NOT-A-WHEEZE — $35,000 · HealthCAMP NOT-…BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $25,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation — $25,000 · HealthHORSES WITH HEART INC — $25,000 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthNORTHLAND CARES — $24,000 · Health+4 more — $35,000 · Health+4 moreST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $152,500 · Food & NutritionSEDONA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $59,000 · Food & NutritionARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK — $33,000 · Food & NutritionPRESCOTT FARMERS MARKET INC — $32,500 · Food & NutritionPRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionYAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $77,325 · Youth DevelopmentThe Launch Pad Teen Center — $61,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC — $7,500 · Youth Development+2 more — $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,490,942Human Services$851,000Education$738,923Arts & Culture$700,000Health$557,100Food & Nutrition$287,000Youth Development$215,825

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $257,423 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetArizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation — $215,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $190,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC — $184,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $152,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPrescott YMCA of Yavapai County (0189) — $115,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetRelease The Fear Inc — $110,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetNORTHLAND HOSPICE — $110,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetPrescott Mountain Bike Alliance — $104,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVERDE VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION — $97,500 over 3y, 47% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC — $90,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $80,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $77,325 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY — $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHLANDS CENTER FOR NATURAL HISTORY — $72,500 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetRESURGE INTERNATIONAL — $72,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE — $70,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetPEOPLE WHO CARE — $67,796 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY — $62,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Launch Pad Teen Center — $61,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSEDONA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $59,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetYavapai Food Bank Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY — $51,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPrescott Unified School District Education Found — $50,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC — $50,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetA NEW LEAF — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC — $45,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker — $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetArizona Citizens for the Arts — $45,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetSHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ — $45,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetAdult Center of Prescott — $42,500 over 2y, 30% of budgetVERDE VALLEY SANCTUARY — $42,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetArizona Crisis Team Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCALA Alliance — $40,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA — $40,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES — $38,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc — $37,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetArizona Theatre Company — $37,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP NOT-A-WHEEZE — $35,000 over 4y, 26% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Prescott YMCA of Yavapai County (0189) ↗
  • Who funds Release The Fear Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND HOSPICE ↗
  • Who funds Prescott Mountain Bike Alliance ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds VERDE VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds YAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE THE CITY ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDS CENTER FOR NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds RESURGE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE WHO CARE ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds The Launch Pad Teen Center ↗
  • Who funds SEDONA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Yavapai Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
  • Who funds YAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Jw Kieckhefer Foundat…Burton Family Foundat…Virginia G Piper Char…The Diane and Bruce H…Thunderbirds CharitiesThe Foundation for Co…The Kemper & Ethel Ma…Desert Financial Cred…John F Long Foundatio…Jewish Community Foun…Perry and Sandy Massi…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ112.5× affinity83 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Jw Kieckhefer Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn · Desert Financial Credit Union · John F Long Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Perry and Sandy Massie Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Margaret T Morris Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Margaret T Morris Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Margaret T Morris Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 204 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines