· Private foundation
Rolley Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k9 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KSU FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,500 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GRAND CANYON | $2,500 |
| THE ALS ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FLAGSTAFF | $2,500 |
| SUNSHINE RESCUE MISSION INC | $2,500 |
| GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUND | $2,400 |
| HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF NORTHERN ARIZO | $2,100 |
| UNITED WAY | $1,500 |
| FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION4× · 2018–2021 · $18k · revenue +40%
- SRSAGEWOOD RESIDENTS' FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +231%
- CCCORNERSTONES COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- KFK-STATE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $1k
- FCFOOD CONNECT COLORADOone grant, 2020 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
Increase, manage, and distribute resources for the benefit of the students, the college, and the community
The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
The foundation is a nonprofit charitable organization associated with eastern new mexico university. its mission is to provide private funding for those programs and scholarships not covered by state approprations, and to build acceptance…
Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.
The cnm foundation is committed to the principle that no central new mexico community college student should be denied the opportunity for an education or vocational training due solely to a lack of financial resources. the cnm foundation…
To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.
To build a thriving southern arizona through philanthropy.
Strengthens its community through assisting donors, making grants, and providing leadership.
To mobilize resources to support and inspire colorado's people in their presesrvation of meaningful places, heritage, and history.
The santa fe conservation trust partners with our community to keep northern new mexico's living lands and people flourishing together. we protect culturally and environmentally significant landscapes, ignite people's passion for nature…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of New Mexico Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sunshine Rescue Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAGEWOOD RESIDENTS' FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONES COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS ↗
- Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO GOVERNOR'S MANSION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sunshine Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FLAGSTAFF ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · One Az Community Foundation Inc · Molly and Joseph Herman Foundation · The Narbha Institute Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rolley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rolley Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rolley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.