Skip to content

California · Public charity

Lava Mae

Lava Mae is a nonprofit that teaches people around the world to bring mobile showers and other services that promote well-being to people experiencing homelessness. We provide 1:1 program consulting, free and fee-based in-depth training, do-it-yourself toolkits, and ongoing support to help people and organizations around the world launch…

$140k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
13
Organizations funded FY2022
54%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 13
FY2019 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
9

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 54% of the organizations Lava Mae funded were first-time grantees, receiving 57% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202213$140k54%
FY20214$44k50%
FY202013$224k77%
FY201910$129kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Housing & Shelter$312kEmployment$100kHuman Services$98kEducation$10kReligion$10kYouth Development$7k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
AZ
NM
TN
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Urban Alchemy$100,00011%
Showering Love Inc$40,000412%
Lighter Loads Atx$35,000318%
Brooklyn Bureau of Community Service$26,00020%
Streetside Showers Inc$25,000210%
Shower Power Inc$22,00025%
Share Community$20,000220%
Cloud Covered Streets$20,00013%
Wave Project$20,000214%
Support the Soupman Corp$20,00023%
Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of Lava Mae by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Urban Alchemy$100,00011%
Showering Love Inc$40,000412%
Lighter Loads Atx$35,000318%
Brooklyn Bureau of Community Service$26,00020%
Streetside Showers Inc$25,000210%
Shower Power Inc$22,00025%
Share Community$20,000220%
Cloud Covered Streets$20,00013%
Wave Project$20,000214%
Support the Soupman Corp$20,00023%
House of Hope Community Development Corporation$15,0001n/a
Red Feather Development Group$12,50011%
Moving Waters$10,5001n/a
Project Refresh Inc$10,00017%
Street Angels Inc$10,00011%
Skid Row Housing Trust$10,00010%
Apostolic Assembly of the Faith in Christ Jesus Inc$10,0001n/a
Merrimack Valley Dream Center Inc$10,00015%
Hearts of Rescue$10,0001n/a
Shower Up$10,00011%
Opportunities for Hope Inc$10,00010%
House of Hope$10,0001n/a
Low Income Housing Institute$10,00010%
Dignity Project$10,00019%
Restoration Community Development Corporation$10,0001n/a
Archangel Raphaels Mission Inc$10,0001n/a
Youthlink$6,50010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($34k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lava Mae supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUrban Alchemy: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetShowering Love Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetLighter Loads Atx: $35,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetBrooklyn Bureau of Community Service: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStreetside Showers Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetShower Power Inc: $22,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetShare Community: $20,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCloud Covered Streets: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWave Project: $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSupport the Soupman Corp: $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetRed Feather Development Group: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetProject Refresh Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetStreet Angels Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSkid Row Housing Trust: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMerrimack Valley Dream Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetShower Up: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOpportunities for Hope Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLow Income Housing Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Project: $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetYouthlink: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Foundation IncNY12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lava Mae with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lava Mae?

Find your warmest path to Lava Mae through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Lava Mae

How much does Lava Mae give?
Lava Mae reported 13 grants totaling $140,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 13 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2022.
What does Lava Mae fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2022, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (58%), Employment (19%), Human Services (18%).
Who are Lava Mae's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2022: Urban Alchemy ($100k), Showering Love Inc ($40k), Lighter Loads Atx ($35k).
Does Lava Mae fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 54% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lava Mae?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc, California Community Foundation, Paypal Charitable Giving Fund.
Where is Lava Mae based?
Lava Mae is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lava Mae’s filings →

More from the funding graph