· Public charity
Save the Storks
We elevate the standards of care that make motherhood accessible by: 1) providing state of the art Mobile Medical Clinics, 2) supporting high-caliber women's health clinics, 3) empowering local organizations and churches to deliver a robust network of resources, and 4) offering a digital platform with 24-hour resources for women.
Read this first · the figures below need context
61% of Save the Storks’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Servant Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 25 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Save the Storks named its own grantees at scale: 31 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $1,343,616 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,500,427 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $156,811 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k6 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $322k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $984k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Caring Families Pregnancy Services | $144,285 |
| Women's Resource Center | $136,934 |
| Every Mother's Advocate | $130,000 |
| Crisis Pregnancy Center of Northern California | $122,984 |
| Women's Care Center of Erie County | $122,984 |
| TruChoice | $82,592 |
| Pregnancy Care Center of Burke County | $70,000 |
| A Woman's Choice | $65,428 |
| Aspire Together | $55,000 |
| Women's Life Services | $53,320 |
| Bridge Women's Center | $46,427 |
| Living Help Center | $35,000 |
| Bright Hope Pregnancy Support Center | $31,427 |
| Crossroads Women's Clinic | $30,000 |
| Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $776k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 79% of Save the Storks’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
54 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2022, 39 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMEVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC2× · 2021–2022 · $295k · revenue +256% · 26% of their budget
- PCPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC4× · 2020–2024 · $260k · revenue +5%
- AAA A COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER2× · 2021–2022 · $216k · revenue +16% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- ACALPHA CLINICSone grant, 2020 · $169k · revenue -41%
- PAPREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $118k · revenue +165%
- SCSOUTHWEST COALITION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $106k · revenue +410%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.
Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.
The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…
Choosing Life over Abortion
Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…
The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center and the most unlike its peers is Abbas Arms Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Servant Foundation ↗
- Who funds EVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds A A COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Hope Center for Crisis Pregnancy dba Hope Womens Resource Clinic ↗
- Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds ALPHA CLINICS ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds TruChoice Pregnancy Resource Center ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CARING FAMILIES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds 1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Horizon Pregnancy Center ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Community Pregnancy Center of Pasadena ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY CENTER NFP ↗
- Who funds Women's Care Center of Erie County Inc ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Triad Coalition for Life ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGON ↗
- Who funds Coastal Pregnancy Care Center ↗
- Who funds ALBEMARLE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound ↗
- Who funds LIFE ADVANCEMENT GROUP ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds CARENET PREGNANCY CENTER OF OKANOGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ABBAS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HEARTREACH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT STEP RESOURCES CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Gateway Womens Resource Center ↗
- Who funds Hands Of Hope Tucson ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Life Network ↗
- Who funds A WOMENS CARE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Mission Pre-Born Inc · 4 US · Carolina Pregnancy Care Fellowship · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Care Net · Florida K of C Charities Inc · God's Gift · Christian Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Save the Storks funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pregnancy Alternatives Center Dba Obria Medical Clinics Oregon — 38% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc — 12% of income from government
- Choices Clinics Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.