· Public charity
Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation
Abortion forward alliance uses public education to develop a constituency that supports the right of every ohioan to make personal choices about a full range of reproductive options, including legal abortion.
Read this first · the figures below need context
90% of Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Hopewell Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $980k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUND'N | $137,585 |
| PRO-CHOICE MASSACHUSETTS FNDN | $137,585 |
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FNDN | $137,585 |
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE WASHINGTON FOUND'N | $137,585 |
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUND'N | $137,585 |
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE MISSOURI FOUND'N | $78,620 |
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE N CAROLINA FNDN | $78,620 |
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE MARYLAND FUND | $78,620 |
| NARAL PRO-CHOICE CONNECTICUT FNDN | $56,158 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building
To support and protect, as a fundamental right and value, a woman's freedom to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices.
Repro rising virginia is a bold, effective, and trusted leader in the political fight for reproductive freedom in virginia. we advocate for laws and policies that guarantee the right to bodily autonomy, including access to abortion care…
To develop and sustain a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee women the right to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices.
The Reproductive Freedom Fund of New Hampshire removes financial barriers for anyone receiving abortion care in or from New Hampshire through direct service funding and movement building guided by patient need.
To develop and sustain a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every woman the right to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive options, including preventing unintended pregnancy, bearing…
Mobile Male Allies in the Fight for Reproductive Freedoms
Abortion forward is committed to developing and sustaining a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every ohioan the right to make personal decisions regarding a full range of reproductive choices, including legal…
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
The DC Abortion Fund helps pay for the abortion care of anyone living in or traveling to the DC Metro region, without restrictions or requirements. DC is a vital access point for the entire East Coast,
Pro-choice oregon works to defend and expand access to essential health care services and education to ensure reproductive freedom is available and accessible to all people in oregon.
Defending and preservinc women's reproductive choices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hopewell Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Pro-Choice Washington Foundation ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Abortion Action Missouri Foundation ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE NC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reproductive Freedom for All · Reproductive Freedom for All Foundation · Hopewell Fund · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · New Venture Fund · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · The Lalor Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc — 25% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.