Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Oak Hill Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Environment$11MHealth$5.5MCivil Rights$2.0MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$1.1MFood & Nutrition$1.0MPhilanthropy$743kHuman Services$674kOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $515k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$84M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FAISON CENTER$250,000
PIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE$150,000
THE VIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD$125,000
WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK INC$100,000
REPRO RISING VIRGINIA FOUNDATION$100,000
JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION$85,000
DC ABORTION FUND$80,000
LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER ASSOCIATION$80,000
PRO-CHOICE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION$75,000
ACLU OF KENTUCKY FDTN INC$65,000
TBA FUND INC$60,000
THE LONGLEAF ALLIANCE$59,375
INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS$50,000
COMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE$50,000
CENTER FOR PROGRESSIVE REFORM$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 14%A STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION TRI-CITIES: $110k → 14%PRO-CHOICE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%THE INGA FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%ROCKFISH VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $30k → 13%WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $75k → 16%NARAL PRO-CHOICE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%THE INGA FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $75k → 16%NARAL PRO-CHOICE NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN: $10k → 16%WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $50k → 16%HOPE CENTER INC: $30k → 12%MILLENNIUM GROUP: $40k → 13%NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN: $10k → 16%WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $45k → 16%HOPE CENTER INC: $30k → 12%NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN: $5k → 16%WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $300 → 16%NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN INC: $5k → 16%NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN: $5k → 16%NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN INC: $5k → 16%HAVEN AT FIRST & MARKET INC: $15k → 8%THE HAVEN AT FIRST & MARKET: $15k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $3k → 8%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $3k → 8%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $3k → 8%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $3k → 8%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $3k → 8%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $3k → 8%READYKIDS: $200 → 8%READYKIDS: $100 → 8%JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC: $40k → 8%JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC: $40k → 8%GEORGIAS FRIENDS: $5k → 8%JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC: $40k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MT
MN
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of The Oak Hill Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 38% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 44% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Oak Hill Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 157 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

157 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 101 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

157
101

Total granted

$21M
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+24%

Still filing today

90%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $342k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VL
    VIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED
    4× · 2020–2024 · $575k · revenue +56%
  • BT
    BOOK TRUST
    3× · 2021–2023 · $500k · revenue +43%
  • THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $450k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • MR
    MESOAMERICAN REEF FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $160k
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $129k
  • AS
    A STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION TRI-CITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $110k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
3
Virginia Environmental Endowment

The endowment's mission is to improve the quality of the environment by using its capital, expertise, and resources to fund projects and programs that encourage all sectors to work together to prevent pollution, improve water quality,…

Environment
4
National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
7
Terraset

Terraset uses philanthropic capital to purchase permanent, high-quality carbon removal. we pool donations from individuals, foundations, family offices, and donor advised funds, and make strategic purchases of high-quality carbon removal…

Environment
8
North Carolina Conservation Network

The north carolina conservation network supports, trains, and coordinates diverse groups and directly advocates to achieve equitable and sustainable solutions for our environment.

Environment
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
11
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
12
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Potomac Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ndponics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Elementary Literacy TutoringPolicy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Local Food System Organizat…Independent K-12 SchoolsSchool Parent OrganizationsDomestic Violence ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and ShelterVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Cancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Public Library OperationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community College Foundatio…Equine Therapy ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/241
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,324

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

228 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 228 of the 273 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
63
Early backer (in before they grew)
226/228
Grantees still filing
158/228
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION — $450,000 · EnvironmentLOCAL ENERGY ALLIANCE PROGRAM INC — $409,248 · EnvironmentSolar United Neighbors Inc — $360,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC — $355,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT — $320,000 · EnvironmentRARE — $315,000 · EnvironmentJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION — $305,000 · EnvironmentVIRGINIA CONSERVATION NETWORK — $305,000 · Environment+54 more — $6,263,441 · Environment+54 moreIndividual grant recipient — $322,500 · OtherACLU OF KENTUCKY FDTN INC — $290,000 · OtherMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $260,000 · OtherVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $325,650 · OtherCultivate Charlottesville — $260,000 · Other+80 more — $6,256,058 · Other+80 moreVIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED — $575,000 · HealthVIRGINIA LEAGUE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC — $400,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project — $300,000 · HealthWomen's Reprodu…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $280,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN …WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE — $275,575 · HealthWHOLE WOMAN'S H…BLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC — $250,263 · HealthBLUE RIDGE ABOR…National Women's Health Network — $225,000 · HealthNational Women'…PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC — $190,200 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…Kentucky Health Justice Network Inc — $122,360 · Health+9 more — $698,460 · Health+9 moreTHE FAISON CENTER INC — $750,000 · EducationBOOK TRUST — $500,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · EducationFoxcroft School — $60,000 · EducationCALVERT SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $60,000 · Education+4 more — $150,943 · EducationWOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK — $245,300 · Human ServicesPRO-CHOICE NC FOUNDATION — $175,000 · Human ServicesJEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesA STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION TRI-CITIES — $110,000 · Human ServicesA STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesDC ABORTION FUND — $80,000 · Human ServicesTHURMAN BRISBEN HOMELESS SHELTER INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesHope Center Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesINGA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human Services+7 more — $210,000 · Human ServicesHOPEWELL FUND — $500,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $300,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MORNING — $100,000 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $90,000 · PhilanthropyALBEMARLE HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $400,000 · Housing & ShelterPIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE — $218,400 · Housing & ShelterPIEDMONT COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterJOURNEY HOME INC — $92,785 · Housing & ShelterGREEN ENERGY CONSUMERS ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHELPING OVERCOME POVERTY'S EXISTENCE IN — $40,000 · Housing & Shelter
Environment$9,082,689Other$7,714,208Health$3,316,858Education$1,600,943Human Services$1,225,300Philanthropy$990,000Housing & Shelter$961,185

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FAISON CENTER INC — $750,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetVIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED — $575,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBOOK TRUST — $500,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetLOCAL ENERGY ALLIANCE PROGRAM INC — $409,248 over 3y, 13% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC — $400,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetALBEMARLE HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $400,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetSolar United Neighbors Inc — $360,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC — $355,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $325,650 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT — $320,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetRARE — $315,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION — $305,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetVIRGINIA CONSERVATION NETWORK — $305,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project — $300,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPotomac Riverkeeper Network — $290,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $280,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE — $275,575 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES — $275,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCultivate Charlottesville — $260,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $260,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetWOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC — $255,000 over 4y, 45% of budgetBLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC — $250,263 over 3y, 18% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $250,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBay Islands Conservation Association Inc — $250,000 over 3y, 81% of budgetWOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK — $245,300 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $240,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $240,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $240,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $240,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTATES NEWSROOM — $234,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LONGLEAF ALLIANCE INC — $231,875 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION — $230,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFRESH ENERGY — $225,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNational Women's Health Network — $225,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $225,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE — $218,400 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR PROGRESSIVE REFORM INC — $205,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetBAY JOURNAL MEDIA INC — $200,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC — $190,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc — $190,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetUPSTATE FOREVER — $184,015 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetCITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE — $180,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPRO-CHOICE NC FOUNDATION — $175,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation — $175,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCERES INC — $175,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area …The J & E Berkley Fou…Perry Foundation IncThe Genan FoundationCaplin FoundationThe Charles Fund IncUnited States Energy …Manning Family Founda…S&P Global Foundation…Oakwood Foundation Ch…Westwind FoundationSentara Health
Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA111.6× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation · The Charles Fund Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · Westwind Foundation · Sentara Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Oak Hill Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Center for Watershed Protection Inc — 64% of income from government
  • Ridge to Reefs Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Clean Energy States Alliance Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Marion Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rethink Energy Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 273 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home