Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Reproductive Freedom for All

REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL's mission is to develop and sustain a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every woman the right to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices, including preventing unintended pregnancy, bearing healthy children, and choosing legal abortion.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Itemized grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
82%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$656k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$250,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 11
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$12M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 82% of the organizations Reproductive Freedom for All funded were first-time grantees, receiving 80% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $586k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$656k40%
FY202411$736k82%
FY20239$340k89%
FY20222$131k100%
FY202111$108k9%
FY202011$157k91%
FY20193$40k100%
FY20171$20kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$693kPublic Benefit$530kHealth$204kScience & Tech$75kHuman Services$29k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
CT
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom$500,00024%
Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee$350,0003n/a
Arizona for Abortion Access$200,0002n/a
Democratic Governors Association$150,0003n/a
Progressive State Leaders Committee Inc$100,00021%
The Reimagination Lab Inc$75,0001n/a
Women Vote$71,0002n/a
Democratic Attorneys General Association$50,0001n/a
NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc$50,00011%
Nebraskans for Reproductive Freedom$50,00010%
Show all 36 grantees
All grantees of Reproductive Freedom for All by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom$500,00024%
Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee$350,0003n/a
Arizona for Abortion Access$200,0002n/a
Democratic Governors Association$150,0003n/a
Progressive State Leaders Committee Inc$100,00021%
The Reimagination Lab Inc$75,0001n/a
Women Vote$71,0002n/a
Democratic Attorneys General Association$50,0001n/a
NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc$50,00011%
Nebraskans for Reproductive Freedom$50,00010%
Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom$50,00010%
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation$39,51328%
Pro-Choice Minnesota Foundation$36,12529%
Reproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc$31,72924%
Abortion Action Missouri Foundation$29,10825%
Pro-Choice Oregon Foundation$28,30132%
Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom PAC$25,00010%
A Better Wisconsin Together Inc$25,00010%
Pro-Choice Virginia Foundation$23,98126%
Reproductive Equity Now Inc$21,00015%
Abortion Forward Alliance$20,97522%
Pa Fund for Change$20,0001n/a
Copper Sky LLC$20,0002n/a
Pro Choice Virginia$20,000110%
Pro-Choice Connecticut Foundation Inc$18,000231%
NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland Fund Inc$15,42723%
Higher Heights for America$15,0001n/a
Nevada Senate Democrats$15,0001n/a
Arizona Democratic Party$15,0001n/a
Pro-Choice Nc Foundation$13,12123%
NARAL Pro-Choice TX Foundation$11,9301n/a
Arizona List$10,0001n/a
Pro-Choice Connecticut Inc$10,0001n/a
Nevada Assembly Democratic Cau$10,0001n/a
Freedom in Reproduction Maryland Inc$6,00011%
Pro-Choice Wyoming$5,0651n/a

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($56k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Reproductive Freedom for All supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 20 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMissourians for Constitutional Freedom: $500,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetProgressive State Leaders Committee Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNebraskans for Reproductive Freedom: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNevadans for Reproductive Freedom: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPro-Choice Washington Foundation: $39,513 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetPro-Choice Minnesota Foundation: $36,125 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetReproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc: $31,729 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetAbortion Action Missouri Foundation: $29,108 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetPro-Choice Oregon Foundation: $28,301 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetOhioans for Reproductive Freedom PAC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA Better Wisconsin Together Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPro-Choice Virginia Foundation: $23,981 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetReproductive Equity Now Inc: $21,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetAbortion Forward Alliance: $20,975 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPro Choice Virginia: $20,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetPro-Choice Connecticut Foundation Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetNARAL Pro-Choice Maryland Fund Inc: $15,427 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPro-Choice Nc Foundation: $13,121 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFreedom in Reproduction Maryland Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reproductive Freedom for All FoundationDC34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reproductive Freedom for All Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Abortion Forward Alliance · Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · New Venture Fund · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · America Votes · Open Society Action Fund Inc · National Institute for Reproductive Health Action Fund Inc · North Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Reproductive Freedom for All with peer funders

About Reproductive Freedom for All

How much does Reproductive Freedom for All give?
Reproductive Freedom for All reported 10 itemized grants totaling $656,000, out of $1,500,072 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Reproductive Freedom for All fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Civil Rights (45%), Public Benefit (35%), Health (13%).
Who are Reproductive Freedom for All's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Missourians for Constitutional Freedom ($500k), Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee ($350k), Arizona for Abortion Access ($200k).
Does Reproductive Freedom for All fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 82% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Reproductive Freedom for All?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Reproductive Freedom for All Foundation, Hopewell Fund, Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Where is Reproductive Freedom for All based?
Reproductive Freedom for All is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reproductive Freedom for All’s filings →

More from the funding graph