· Public charity
Reproductive Freedom for All
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL's mission is to develop and sustain a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every woman the right to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices, including preventing unintended pregnancy, bearing healthy children, and choosing legal abortion.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $736,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,434,664 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $698,664 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $450k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURIANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM | $250,000 |
| DEMOCRACTIC LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGN | $100,000 |
| ARIZONA FOR ABORTION ACCESS | $100,000 |
| NEBRASKANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM | $50,000 |
| PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE | $50,000 |
| NEVADANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM | $50,000 |
| NEW YORKERS FOR EQUAL RIGHTS INC | $50,000 |
| DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA FUND FOR CHANGE | $20,000 |
| COPPER SKY LLC | $10,000 |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR MARYLANDERS INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +123% since the first grant, against +73% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $586k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PWPro-Choice Washington Foundation2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +232%
- PMPRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $36k · revenue +26%
- REREPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $32k · revenue +343%
Funded once
- TRThe Reimagination Lab Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +321%
- ABA BETTER WISCONSIN TOGETHER INCone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -45%
- OFOhioans for Reproductive Freedom PACone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mobile Male Allies in the Fight for Reproductive Freedoms
Abortion forward is committed to developing and sustaining a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every ohioan the right to make personal decisions regarding a full range of reproductive choices, including legal…
To support and protect, as a fundamental right and value, a woman's freedom to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices.
To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building
Ballot issue political action committee in the State of Ohio to advocate for the passage of a constitutional amendment to protect reproductive rights.
To develop and sustain a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee women the right to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices.
The Reproductive Freedom Fund of New Hampshire removes financial barriers for anyone receiving abortion care in or from New Hampshire through direct service funding and movement building guided by patient need.
To develop and sustain a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every woman the right to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive options, including preventing unintended pregnancy, bearing…
Abortion Action Missouri envisions a world with stigma-free abortion access and reproductive freedom for all. Our mission is to foster and sustain a Midwest movement for control of our bodies, lives, and futures.
Our mission is to advocate for the right of all Kentuckians to exercise reproductive and religious freedom consistent with their beliefs. We use advocacy, education, and outreach to support access to reproductive health services, including…
Protect Women Ohio Action is a Section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization and registered ballot committee in the State of Ohio engaged in advocacy activities related to the "Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and…
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro-Choice Virginia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Reimagination Lab Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Missourians for Constitutional Freedom ↗
- Who funds The Reimagination Lab Inc ↗
- Who funds NEVADANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds Pro-Choice Washington Foundation ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Abortion Action Missouri Foundation ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A BETTER WISCONSIN TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom PAC ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW INC ↗
- Who funds ABORTION FORWARD ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PRO CHOICE VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE NC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds Freedom in Reproduction Maryland Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reproductive Freedom for All Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Abortion Forward Alliance · Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · New Venture Fund · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · America Votes · Open Society Action Fund Inc · National Institute for Reproductive Health Action Fund Inc · North Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reproductive Freedom for All funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.