Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc

National institute for reproductive health, inc.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$627k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $627k
$35,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACTION FUND INC$627,356
LILITH FUND INC PD$50,000
ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE$50,000
ELEPHANT CIRCLE$50,000
COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY$38,000
OUR JUSTICE$35,000
PERINATAL HEALTH EQUITY INITIATIVE$35,000
REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION$35,000
CHICAGO SOUTH SIDE BIRTH CENTER$29,875
GIRLS FOR GENDER EQUITY INC$25,000
LOUISIANA ABORTION FUND$22,500
NANCY DAVIS FOUNDATION$22,500
CHICAGO VOLUNTEER DOULAS$20,125
DESERT STAR INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY PLANNING INC$17,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $287k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $15k → 22%NAPAWF: $10k → 14%SOUTHERN BIRTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $18k → 15%PRO-CHOICE MISSOURI FOUNDATION: $25k → 21%EL PUEBLO: $25k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN UNITED: $39k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE MISSOURI FOUNDATION: $20k → 21%YOUNG WOMEN UNITED: $33k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE MISSOURI FOUNDATION: $14k → 21%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI: $50k → 23%CHICAGO VOLUNTEER DOULAS: $20k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY IN ACTION: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.8M · 38 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
55

Total granted

$6.8M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+37%

Still filing today

97%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RE
    REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $651k · revenue +1000% · 38% of their budget
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $225k · revenue +11%
  • EW
    EMBOLDEN WI INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $208k · revenue +203%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CLINICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2018 · $87k · revenue -35%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
2
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
3
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
4
Health Access Fund

Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.

Health
5
Pro-Choice Washington

To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building

—
6
New River Abortion Access Fund

New river abortion access fund builds power and provides direct financial and practical support to southwest virginians and appalachians seeking abortion care. we dedicated to ensuring that all people have the autonomy and resources to…

Civil Rights
7
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
8
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
9
Abortion Care Network

Abortion care network's unique role in the abortion care community is to support independent abortion care providers and the patients they serve. to do so, we provide direct programming, technical assistance and grants directly to our…

Health
10
Power to Decide

Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…

Human Services
11
National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc

National institute for reproductive health, inc. works to protect and advance equitable access to reproductive health care by building power at the state and local level. using an approach that is rooted in partnerships with state and…

Civil Rights
12
Dc Abortion Fund

The DC Abortion Fund helps pay for the abortion care of anyone living in or traveling to the DC Metro region, without restrictions or requirements. DC is a vital access point for the entire East Coast,

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Avow Foundation for Abortion Access. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Dance Arts OrganizationsCommunity Arts CentersPregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%61%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%1/103
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,462

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
91/95
Grantees still filing
65/95
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACTION FUND INC — $3,048,396 · OtherNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACTION FUND INCCHERRY HILL WOMENS CENTER — $267,000 · OtherCHERRY HILL WOMENS CENTER+42 more — $1,445,836 · Other+42 moreEMBOLDEN WI INC — $208,000 · HealthEMBOLDEN WI INCCONVERGE INC — $150,000 · HealthCONVERGE INCDESERT STAR INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY PLANNING INC — $132,000 · HealthDESERT STAR INSTITUT…OUR JUSTICE — $97,500 · HealthOUR JUSTICEUNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $95,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY HEALTH SY…UNIVERSITY CLINICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (UCERA) — $86,774 · HealthUNIVERSITY CLINICAL …COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS — $78,000 · HealthIntermountain Planned Parenthood — $64,759 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $63,000 · HealthWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE — $59,000 · HealthKentucky Health Justice Network Inc — $57,000 · HealthHEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC — $55,000 · Health+15 more — $377,540 · Health+15 moreREPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC — $650,800 · Civil RightsREPRODUCTIVE …COBALT FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Civil RightsCOBALT FOUNDA…THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC — $60,000 · Civil RightsTHE RECONCILI…MARCH ON MARYLAND — $45,000 · Civil RightsSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW — $37,500 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $33,000 · Civil Rights+6 more — $92,330 · Civil Rights+6 moreBOLD FUTURES NM — $71,500 · Human ServicesAbortion Action Missouri Foundation — $58,500 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL HEALTH — $50,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI — $50,000 · Human ServicesEL PUEBLO INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesChicago Volunteer Doulas Inc — $20,125 · Human ServicesASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY IN ACTION — $20,000 · Human ServicesAll-Options — $19,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN BIRTH JUSTICE NETWORK — $17,500 · Human ServicesResources for Human Development Inc — $14,500 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $225,000 · EducationSISTERREACH — $95,000 · EducationNew Jersey Policy Perspective — $133,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureNARAL Pro-Choice Maryland Fund Inc — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $6,000 · Arts & CultureELEPHANT CIRCLE — $50,000 · Crime & LegalGIRLS FOR GENDER EQUITY INC — $45,000 · Crime & LegalGENDER JUSTICE — $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,761,232Health$1,523,573Civil Rights$988,630Human Services$356,125Education$320,000Arts & Culture$184,000Crime & Legal$115,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACTION FUND INC — $3,048,396 over 5y, 87% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC — $650,800 over 7y, 38% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMBOLDEN WI INC — $208,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetCONVERGE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $145,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetNew Jersey Policy Perspective — $133,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetDESERT STAR INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY PLANNING INC — $132,000 over 6y, 23% of budgetPRO-CHOICE CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $130,000 over 4y, 95% of budgetARIZONA FAMILY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP — $115,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetOUR JUSTICE — $97,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $95,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSISTERREACH — $95,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY CLINICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (UCERA) — $86,774 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $85,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCOLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS — $78,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetBOLD FUTURES NM — $71,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIntermountain Planned Parenthood — $64,759 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $63,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEVERTHRIVE ILLINOIS — $62,503 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE — $59,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAbortion Action Missouri Foundation — $58,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO MI — $57,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKentucky Health Justice Network Inc — $57,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetFeminist Womens Health Center Inc — $55,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC — $55,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZATION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL HEALTH — $50,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI — $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC — $47,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGIRLS FOR GENDER EQUITY INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMARCH ON MARYLAND — $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWest Fund — $40,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW — $37,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $33,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAvow Foundation for Abortion Access — $30,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSISTERLOVE INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEL PUEBLO INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Susan Thompson Bu…Hopewell FundMs Foundation for Wom…Groundswell FundAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundRockefeller Philanthr…National Women's Law …National Network of A…Planned Parenthood Fe…The Prentice Foundati…NEO Philanthropy Inc
The Susan Thompson Buffett FoundationNE69.5× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Groundswell Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · National Women's Law Center · National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · The Prentice Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Health Equity Solutions Inc — 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines