· Private foundation
James N McCoy Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $777k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+12 grants · $9.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK | $2,375,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN MANOR INC | $1,550,000 |
| UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS | $750,000 |
| CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS | $750,000 |
| WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC | $575,000 |
| MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $520,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE FORT WORTH INC | $450,000 |
| WICHITA FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $337,750 |
| WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION | $320,000 |
| HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS | $300,000 |
| ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH OF WINDTHORST | $250,000 |
| SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC | $150,000 |
| A BUNCH OF RAGAMUFFINS | $145,640 |
| HUNDRED CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $9.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
86 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYoung Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls4× · 2020–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +40%
- PMPresbyterian Manor Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +16%
- HOHospice of Wichita Falls Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +18%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF AG SCIENCEone grant, 2024 · $200k · 26% of their budget
- TTTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $100k
- COCHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERDone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
The organization is dedicated to providing quality, comprehensive services to pregnant women, infants, and toddlers. teaming with other agencies enables them to help each child and family achieve social competency. early head start…
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.
In partnership with the community, christmas in action rehabilitates the homes of low income elderly and low income disabled so that they may continue to live in warmth, safety and independence.
To support and compliment the work of Workforce Solutions of West Central Texas Board, which is responsible for the planning, oversight, and evaluation of a consolidated workforce system for the 19 County West Central Texas region.
To provide emergency/supplemental assistance in the form of food, clothing, household items, utility, rent and mortgage aid to people in need in the waco community.also provides case management assistance to people wanting to become…
The wichita county community foundation is a nonprofit, non-sectarian organization dedicated to preserving local wealth so the communities in and around leoti and wichita county will forever remain attractive places to live, work and raise…
We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.
The mission of casa of west texas is to recruit, train and support committed volunteers who are appointed by the court to advocate for the best interest of children in the foster care system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc and the most unlike its peers is Whispers of Hope Horse Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian Manor Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
- Who funds Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Midwestern State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GENESIS PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds HUNDRED CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS ↗
- Who funds WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AG SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds BEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS CLUB OF BURKBURNETT BURKBURNETT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds INHERITANCE ADOPTIONS ↗
- Who funds TEXOMA MOTHER & UNBORN BABY CARE INC PREGNANCY HELP CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM ↗
- Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House ↗
- Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds North Texas Rehabilitation Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Patsy's House Children's Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds A BUNCH OF RAGAMUFFINS ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · The Fain Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Donnell Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Dillard Family Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · Libra Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James N McCoy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to James N McCoy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to James N McCoy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.