· Public charity
United Way of Navarro County Texas Inc
The united fund provides funds to charitable organizations that provide aid to the community and individuals in need.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $220k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AND SERVICES | $40,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $30,000 |
| COMPASSION CORSICANA | $25,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $25,000 |
| YMCA AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM | $23,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $15,000 |
| YMCA YOUTH SPORTS | $12,000 |
| CHRISTMAS IN ACTION | $10,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS N CENTRAL TEXAS | $10,000 |
| WAREHOUSE OF LIVEING ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| YMCA-DAY CAMP | $10,000 |
| CAMP OF THE RISING SUN | $10,000 |
| THE CHILD ADVOCACY CNTRCASA | $9,000 |
| CHILD ADVOCATES OF NAVARRO COUNTY | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $894k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYoung Mens Christian Association of Corsicana9× · 2017–2025 · $289k · revenue +211%
- FSFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION DBA COMPASSION CORSICANA9× · 2017–2025 · $248k · revenue +378%
- PCPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $244k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- HOHOUSE OF REFUGEone grant, 2019 · $45k
FAMILY ABUSE CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue +13%- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2019 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
To work to ensure children receive the needed services to overcome abuse and neglect.
To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.
To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.
CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.
To provide shelter to abused families.
To provide trained court appointed volunteers to serve as advocates for the best interests of abused and neglected children in harrison county texas
Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.
Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…
Child Advocacy
To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Abuse Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp of the Rising Sun. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Corsicana ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION DBA COMPASSION CORSICANA ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Navarro County Children's Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CONNECT ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Navarro County ↗
- Who funds CAMP OF THE RISING SUN ↗
- Who funds NAVARRO COUNTY FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTMAS IN APRIL-NAVARRO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PROLIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Navarro Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Navarro County Texas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.