Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ed Rachal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28M
Granted FY2025still arriving
344
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$43MCivil Rights$18MEducation$16MHealth$13MFood & Nutrition$10MHousing & Shelter$8.6MPublic Benefit$6.6MArts & Culture$4.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 344 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k87 grants · $303k
  • $10k–50k158 grants · $3.5M
  • $50k–250k90 grants · $6.3M
  • $250k+9 grants · $17M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$825M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HALO FLIGHT$5,439,911
LOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION$5,000,000
PALACIOS MARINE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH$4,000,000
REMEMBER THE ALAMO FOUNDATION$1,000,000
COASTAL BEND BAYS & ESTUARIES$610,095
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CENTER$500,000
SOUTH TEXAS MISSION OF MERCY$300,000
CITY OF PALACIOS$300,000
NUECES COUNTY$290,471
DIOCESE OF CORPUS CHRISTI$200,000
PALACIOS ISD$160,000
ANNAPOLIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$150,000
SPECIAL ANGELS OF THE WOODLANDS$120,211
SA LIFE ACADEMY INC$100,000
PEEWEE'S PET ADOPTION WORLD & SANCTUARY$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $20.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL: $75k → 6%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $50k → 16%CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN: $85k → 19%SUNNY GLEN CHILDREN'S HOME: $75k → 23%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL: $75k → 6%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 10%ARMS OF HOPE: $75k → 12%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $50k → 16%CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 19%SUNNY GLEN CHILDREN'S HOME: $75k → 23%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL: $75k → 6%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 10%ARMS OF HOPE: $50k → 12%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $50k → 16%CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 19%SUNNY GLEN CHILDREN'S HOME: $75k → 23%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 27%ROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARITANS INC: $85k → 17%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 27%JULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES: $40k → 14%CAMP ARANZAZU: $75k → 17%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 27%JULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES: $40k → 14%CHILDREN'S COALITION OF ARANSAS COUNTY: $75k → 17%CAMP ARANZAZU: $75k → 17%CAMP ARANZAZU: $75k → 17%CHILDREN'S COALITION OF ARANSAS COUNTY: $50k → 17%MILITARY VIP INC: $58k → 17%THE WAY HOME ADOPTION: $30k → 16%MILITARY VIP INC: $58k → 17%VIOLA'S HUGE HEART FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%YMCA OF THE COASTAL BEND: $70k → 17%KIDS' MEAL: $40k → 16%KIDS' MEALS: $30k → 16%SMARTIE PANTS ACADEMY CENTER HOUSTON: $35k → 16%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $87k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $60k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $45k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI AREA COUNCIL FOR THE: $30k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI AREA COUNCIL FOR THE DEAF: $30k → 17%LOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION: $7.4M → 17%LOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION: $5.2M → 17%LOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION: $5.0M → 17%YMCA OF THE COASTAL BEND: $201k → 17%MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE DAY NURSERY: $50k → 17%MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE DAY NURSERY: $50k → 17%MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE DAY NURSERY: $50k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $45k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$74M · 272 repeat orgs$31M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

272 repeat relationships — 217 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 94 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

272
231

Total granted

$74M
$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+8%

Still filing today

61%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +96% · 97% of their budget
  • PM
    PALACIOS MARINE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9.5M · revenue +22% · 95% of their budget
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    5× · 2017–2025 · $850k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • AP
    ASSET PURCHASES TREATED AS QUALIFYING DISTRIBUTIO
    one grant, 2023 · $6.8M
  • TG
    THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3.0M · revenue 0%
  • CO
    CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI - LAMAR LOCATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $2.3M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
2
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
3
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
4
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
5
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
6
Texas Christian Foundation

Texas Christian Foundations mission is to mobilize resources by inspiring biblical generosity and educating Texans on ways their generosity can impact their community, Texas and the world.

Philanthropy
7
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
8
Texas a&M-Corpus Christi Foundation

For the benefit of texas a&m university - corpus christi

Education
9
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
10
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
11
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
12
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clarity Child Guidance Center and the most unlike its peers is Rob & Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChildhood Health & WellnessK-12 Education & Youth Deve…Private Membership ClubsArts & Culture FundersRegional Chambers of Commer…Youth Sports ProgramsDiverse Social ServicesSchool Activity BoostersResidential Community Assoc…Ethnic & Faith Community Ce…Affordable Housing ProvidersK-12 Charter and Independen…Texas Environmental AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesChild & Family Support Serv…Education FoundationsHospital Systems and Physic…Family Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%5%<5yr16%12%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr12%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%2%<5yr16%52%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr12%10%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/313
the rest of the field
16%
9,464/57,991

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

266 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 266 of the 599 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

26
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
72
Early backer (in before they grew)
258/266
Grantees still filing
176/266
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSET PURCHASES TREATED AS QUALIFYING DISTRIBUTIO — $6,799,423 · OtherASSET PURCHASES TREATED AS QUALIFYING DISTRIBUTIOHALO FLIGHT INC — $5,439,911 · OtherHALO FLIGHT INCCITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI - LAMAR LOCATIONS — $2,305,800 · OtherCITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI - LAMAR LOCATIONSUTMD ANDERSON — $2,150,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $1,750,000 · OtherST PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $1,500,000 · Other+123 more — $22,987,621 · Other+123 moreLOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION — $24,269,741 · Human ServicesLOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION+27 more — $4,988,153 · Human Services+27 morePALACIOS MARINE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INC — $9,500,000 · Science & TechPALACIOS MA…THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION — $3,000,000 · EducationANNAPOLIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $600,000 · EducationAGORA MINISTRIES INC — $578,398 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation — $488,000 · EducationRISE SCHOOL OF CORPUS CHRISTI — $405,000 · EducationROCKPORT FULTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 · Education+5 more — $755,000 · EducationTexas Children's Hospital — $850,000 · HealthCOMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC — $600,000 · HealthCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $424,000 · HealthDriscoll Children's Hospital — $250,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $250,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $205,000 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND — $200,000 · HealthTHRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION — $200,000 · HealthTEXAS FIRE FIGHTERS HOME — $150,000 · HealthCHRISTIAN FARMS TREEHOUSE INC — $125,000 · Health+3 more — $226,000 · HealthRemember the Alamo Foundation — $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC — $300,000 · Arts & CultureLone Star Flight Museum — $250,000 · Arts & CultureBo's Place — $250,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS MARITIME MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC — $190,000 · Arts & CultureHRI FOUNDATION — $175,000 · Arts & CultureROCKPORT CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT — $150,000 · Arts & CulturePORT ARANSAS ART CENTER — $130,000 · Arts & CultureRockport Art Association Inc — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $336,690 · Arts & CulturePEEWEE'S PET ADOPTION WORLD & SANCTUARY INC — $375,000 · AnimalsSOUTH TEXAS ANIMAL RESCUE GROUP — $300,050 · AnimalsSPCA SAN PAT COUNTY — $275,000 · AnimalsCATTERY INC — $270,000 · AnimalsDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $150,000 · Animals
Other$42,932,755Human Services$29,257,894Science & Tech$9,500,000Education$6,226,398Health$3,480,000Arts & Culture$2,881,690Animals$1,370,050

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION — $24,269,741 over 5y, 97% of budgetPALACIOS MARINE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INC — $9,500,000 over 3y, 95% of budgetTHE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION — $3,000,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $850,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $645,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWEST SIDE HELPING HAND — $600,000 over 5y, 73% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC — $600,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetANNAPOLIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $600,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetAGORA MINISTRIES INC — $578,398 over 5y, 21% of budgetTEXAS RANGER ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $525,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $488,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION — $430,863 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR — $425,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $424,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetRISE SCHOOL OF CORPUS CHRISTI — $405,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetROCKPORT FULTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetPEEWEE'S PET ADOPTION WORLD & SANCTUARY INC — $375,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $360,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetAGAPE RANCH — $333,500 over 3y, 24% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION — $322,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PALACIOS LIBRARY INC — $314,500 over 3y, 59% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS ANIMAL RESCUE GROUP — $300,050 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC — $300,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetSunny Glen Children's Home Inc — $300,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetYMCA of the Coastal Bend — $275,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetSPCA SAN PAT COUNTY — $275,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetCATTERY INC — $270,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetAdult and Teen Challenge of Texas — $270,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC — $265,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDriscoll Children's Hospital — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLone Star Flight Museum — $250,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSA Life Academy — $250,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetBo's Place — $250,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNehemiah Center Inc — $250,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetWASHINGTON ON THE BRAZOS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN — $235,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTIMON'S MINISTRIES — $230,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetCentral Texas Children's Home — $229,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetCamp Aranzazu Inc — $225,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC — $225,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC — $215,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION — $215,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $205,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPORT ARANSAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc — $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND — $200,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES — $200,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOUISE ALLEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PALACIOS MARINE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HALO FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE HELPING HAND ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds AGORA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RANGER ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RISE SCHOOL OF CORPUS CHRISTI ↗
  • Who funds ROCKPORT FULTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PEEWEE'S PET ADOPTION WORLD & SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE RANCH ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PALACIOS LIBRARY INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Bend Communit…Behmann Brothers Foun…The John G and Marie …Allen Lovelace Moore …Earl C Sams Foundatio…United Way of the Coa…Puente de Maravillas …Susser Family Foundat…Frazier Family Founda…San Antonio Area Foun…Laverne & Thomas Howe…Alice Kleberg Reynold…
Coastal Bend Community FoundationTX138.9× affinity74 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Bend Community Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · Earl C Sams Foundation Inc · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · Puente de Maravillas Foundation · Susser Family Foundation · Frazier Family Foundation Inc · San Antonio Area Foundation · Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ed Rachal Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ed Rachal Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ed Rachal Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 599 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home