How much did NORTH TEXAS AREA UNITED WAY INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of NORTH TEXAS AREA UNITED WAY INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

housingchristianbuildmusic

2022

music

2023

music

2024

music

2025

music

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k12 grants · $217k
$250k+2 grants · $1.5M

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC$817,166
WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$683,906
ZAVALA HISPANIC CULTURAL INITIATIVE$27,500
THE KITCHEN$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WICHITA FALLS$25,000
WICHITA ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL$20,000
SENIOR CITIZENS ACTIVITY CENTER OF BURKBURNETT INC$20,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF WICHITA FALLS$20,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$16,000
CHILD CARE INC$15,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME$15,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF WICHITA FALLS$13,000
WICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
THE ARTS COUNCIL WICHITA FALLS$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $959k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 14%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$11M · 19 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$11M

$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

+39%

Still filing today

84%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NC
NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $4.8M · revenue +67%
CC
CHILD CARE INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $247k · revenue +43%
BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WICHITA FALLS
8× · 2018–2025 · $227k · revenue +227%

Funded once

HO
HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLSgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +39%
HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - WICHITA FALLS TX
one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -22%
IP
IOWA PARK RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES CENTER
one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services

Wichita Family Crisis Center

To eliminate domestic violence by supporting survivors through shelter, education, and advocacy.

Human Services

Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and

To provide leadership to support, promote and cultivate the arts in Wichita Falls and the surrounding area.

Arts & Culture

Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

Our vision is to eliminate homelessness.

Religion

Music Theatre Wichita

Music theatre wichita is dedicated to stimulating and nurturing interest in musical theatre by producing and/or presenting broadway quality productions while entertaining and educating patrons, the community and theatrical artists.

Arts & Culture

Kansas Humane Society of Wichita Kansas

Operation of an animal shelter.

Animals

Wichita Falls Area Community

To enhance the quality of life in the Wichita Falls area through the promotion and support of charitable giving.

Philanthropy

Wichita Swim Club

To teach swimming skills to individuals of all ages and to support participation in competitive swimming

Recreation & Sports

Christmas in Action

To repair the homes of low-income elderly and low-income disabled homeowners in wichita county, texas.

Housing & Shelter

Wichita County Heritage Society

Inspire and educate the community to engage in preservation through the kell house heritage center.

Arts & Culture

Walworth County Care Center Inc

The mission of the walworth county care center is to provide access to long-term care services in a high quality, compassionate, and dignified manner to residents in walworth county.

Health

Wichita Children's Theatre Inc

To provide educational programs to children in the community with regard to performing arts

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizen Services of North Texas and the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

46/549

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/20

Grantees still filing

16/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$4,779,379Other$4,573,644Human Services$958,712Arts & Culture$286,739Education$109,984Youth Development$109,882Food & Nutrition$16,989

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita Falls Area CommunityTX46× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Falls Area Community · The Priddy Foundation · James N McCoy Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Fain Foundation · J S Bridwell Foundation · Dillard Family Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NORTH TEXAS AREA UNITED WAY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WICHITA ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 751882867 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WICHITA ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 44% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to North Texas Area United Way Inc?

Find your warmest path to North Texas Area United Way Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NORTH TEXAS AREA UNITED WAY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to North Texas Area United Way Inc?

More from the funding graph

NORTH TEXAS AREA UNITED WAY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to North Texas Area United Way Inc?

More from the funding graph