· Private foundation
Philip E Lattavo Family Foundation Lattavo
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of PHILIP E LATTAVO FAMILY FOUNDATION LATTAVO’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HABITAT OF STARK COUNTY | $76,500 |
| FLORIDA SHERIFFS YOUTH RANCHES | $2,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $2,000 |
| DOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBRARY | $2,000 |
| MALONE UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| ST FRANCIS OF ASSIS CATHOLIC CHURC | $2,000 |
| ARTS IN STARK | $2,000 |
| STARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| PATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN | $1,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| ST JOHNS VILLA | $1,000 |
| TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CANTON BALLET | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AIARTS IN STARK5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +45%
- SJST JOHN'S VILLA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +46%
- PCPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN8× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- HAHABITAT AGING IN PLACEone grant, 2022 · $10k
- TCTUCSON CHARITY BRIDGE CLUB INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -71%
- PSPregnancy Support Networkgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…
Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.
La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Disabled American Veterans (Dav) Charitable Service Trust and the most unlike its peers is Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
- Who funds TUCSON CHARITY BRIDGE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S VILLA INC ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Support Network ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
- Who funds ROTAPLAST INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds STARK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity Tucson Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
- Who funds Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust ↗
- Who funds A COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS OF STARK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation · Ada C Rank & Helen J Rank Charitable · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Timken Foundation of Canton · Premier Bank Foundation · Synchrony Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Philip E Lattavo Family Foundation Lattavo funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.