Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

LIFECHOICES

LIFECHOICES (Missouri) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $868,698 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ($221,000). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$2.1M
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$869k
Net assets
$4.5M
14/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 11%
01What it does

What Lifechoices does

Mission

We empower and equip individuals to make healthy life choices through education and medical services.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Medical sexual health services including: comprehensive hiv/std/pap testing for women/men with physician consults and/or referrals and treatment, pregnancy testing, limited ob ultrasounds with obgyn consults, victim-centered services for survivors of those in sexual exploitation/domestic trafficking. Training seminars for sexual health providers.

    $1,049,024 spent$38,045 earned by the program
    63% of program spending
  2. Prevention services through connection institute provides: comprehensive sexual risk avoidance education in area schools and education/information for private/public community forums.

    $306,784 spent$20,659 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  3. Client services (non-medical) provides: pregnancy options advocacy for mothers/fathers, prenatal/parenting classes, post-reproductive loss support groups/referrals, care-coordination for community resources.

    $305,868 spent
    18% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,661,676.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.3M) Net assets 100 ($1.8M)2018 Revenue 109 ($1.3M) Expenses 102 ($1.3M) Net assets 103 ($1.9M)2019 Revenue 114 ($1.3M) Expenses 103 ($1.3M) Net assets 108 ($2.0M)2020 Revenue 141 ($1.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.3M) Net assets 130 ($2.4M)2021 Revenue 187 ($2.2M) Expenses 102 ($1.3M) Net assets 180 ($3.3M)2022 Revenue 149 ($1.7M) Expenses 112 ($1.4M) Net assets 196 ($3.6M)2023 Revenue 163 ($1.9M) Expenses 118 ($1.5M) Net assets 217 ($3.9M)2024 Revenue 194 ($2.3M) Expenses 143 ($1.8M) Net assets 240 ($4.4M)2025 Revenue 184 ($2.1M) Expenses 156 ($2.0M) Net assets 248 ($4.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (184)Expenses (156)Net assets (248)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.4M to $3.3M (+37%).

$1.9M
$1.9M
$2.0M
$2.4M
$3.3M
$3.6M
$4.0M
$4.4M
$4.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

54% of LIFECHOICES’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$123k
’17
−$39k
’18
$9k
’19
$354k
’20
$871k
’21
$289k
’22
$376k
’23
$414k
’24
$136k
’25
6.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed998881111108
Joined·+2+2+0+0+5+2+0+0
No longer listed·23002212
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 14 funders, grant income rose $18k → $150k.

9 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 71% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LIFECHOICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LIFECHOICES has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

72% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LIFECHOICES.

25%
largest funder
59%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 48% · 2019 44% · 2020 78% · 2021 27% · 2022 35% · 2023 20% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of LIFECHOICES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

71% of LIFECHOICES's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $254k that is directly attributable, 64% of it comes from Missouri funders.

MN
WI
IN
MO
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $615k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

LIFECHOICES runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 4,665 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve6.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,665 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like LIFECHOICES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 8%Fundraising 9%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LIFECHOICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LIFECHOICES?
LIFECHOICES (Missouri) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $868,698 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ($221,000). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does LIFECHOICES have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $868,698 in grants to LIFECHOICES, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LIFECHOICES?
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $221,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LIFECHOICES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing