Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Osborne Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$398kYouth Development$288kReligion$188kHealth$65kHousing & Shelter$51kHuman Services$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
$7,200
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Christ in Youth$35,000
LIFE OF HOPE MINISTRIES$30,000
Northwest Haiti Christian Mission$10,000
God's Resort$10,000
FILTER OF HOPE$8,400
NEW TRIBES MISSION$7,200
ANTIOCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$6,000
Carthage Crisis Center$5,000
PIONEER BIBLE TRANSLATORS$4,800
LIFECHOICES DBA CHOICES MEDICAL SERVICES$4,800
Peterson Outdoors Ministries$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PETERSON OUTDOORS MINISTRIES: $3k → 18%Peterson Outdoors Ministries: $2k → 18%Peterson Outdoors Ministries: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$5k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHousing & ShelterReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CHRIST IN YOUTH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $288k · revenue +78%
  • LO
    LIFE OF HOPE MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $273k · revenue +100%
  • GR
    Gods Resort Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $51k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH OF ORONOGO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifecare Pregnancy Resources Inc

Sharing the gospel message and upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of Christ to men and women facing unplanned pregnancies by providing spiritual, physical, and emotional support.

Human Services
2
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

3
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
4
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
5
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
6
Life Ministries

Life ministries existes to shepherd people in a process of discoverying god's heart through teaching, writing, and spiritual direction in order to usher freedom through jesus christ.

7
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
8
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
9
Life Choices Resource Center

Promoting the sanctity of human life by reaching out with christ's love through our pregnancy resource center, medical clinic, and sexual and relationship educational programs.

Health
10
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
11
Pregnancy Care Center of Lagrange Inc

Pregnancy care center of lagrange is a christ-centered ministry providing medical and educational services to those facing unplanned pregnancies, encouraging sexual integrity, and empowering individuals to make life affirming choices.

Health
12
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Care Center and the most unlike its peers is Carthage Crisis Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRIST IN YOUTH INC — $287,500 · OtherCHRIST IN YOUTH INCNORTHWEST HAITI CHRISTIAN MISSION — $92,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HAITI CHRISTIAN MISSIONETHNOS360 INC — $86,900 · OtherETHNOS360 INCVARIOUS GRANTS — $83,300 · OtherVARIOUS GRANTSANTIOCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $48,000 · OtherANTIOCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALFILTER OF HOPE INC — $33,600 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC — $33,600 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherLIFE OF HOPE MINISTRIES — $272,500 · InternationalLIFE OF HOPE MINISTRIESCARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC — $35,000 · HealthPREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $15,500 · HealthLIFECHOICES — $14,000 · HealthGods Resort Inc — $51,000 · Housing & ShelterPioneer Bible Translators — $14,400 · ReligionPETERSON OUTDOORS MINISTRIES — $7,000 · Human Services
Other$669,900International$272,500Health$64,500Housing & Shelter$51,000Religion$14,400Human Services$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHRIST IN YOUTH INC — $287,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetLIFE OF HOPE MINISTRIES — $272,500 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetGods Resort Inc — $51,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC — $33,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $15,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPioneer Bible Translators — $14,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFECHOICES — $14,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPETERSON OUTDOORS MINISTRIES — $7,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRIST IN YOUTH INC
  • Who funds LIFE OF HOPE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Gods Resort Inc
  • Who funds CARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
  • Who funds Pioneer Bible Translators
  • Who funds LIFECHOICES
  • Who funds PETERSON OUTDOORS MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Servant Foundation · Jerry and Nancy Perry Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Osborne Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph