· Private foundation
Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust
Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of The Ozarks Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $7k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROMUSICA | $600 |
| CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRY COUNTY INC | $600 |
| JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND | $550 |
| WILDCAT GLADES FRIENDS GROUP | $500 |
| LIFECHOICES | $500 |
| REGIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE ASSOC | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| JOPLIN FAMILY Y | $400 |
| COMMUNITY CLINIC | $400 |
| MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN | $400 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF JOPLIN | $400 |
| CONNECT2CULTURE | $400 |
| JOPLIN NALA | $340 |
| ALLIANCE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI | $300 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHERN MO | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JAJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +59%
- PMPRO MUSICA2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +7%
- SMSOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN2× · 2017–2019 · $700 · revenue +20%
Funded once
- LHLAFAYETTE HOUSEone grant, 2018 · $650
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF JOPLINone grant, 2018 · $650
- JAJOPLIN ASSOC FOR THE BLINDone grant, 2018 · $600
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the economic prosperity and quality of life in the joplin region, and to be the principal advocate for, and provider of services to its business community
The organization provides emergency services that improve the overall health and welfare of very low and low income individuals and families in the joplin, carl junction, and webb city areas.
The boys and girls club of southwest missouri seeks to identify and address gaps in services to children and families in southwest missouri. programming includes child and teen safety, substance
Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.
The mental health association is committed to individual service in a community based setting that promotes recovery, dignity, personal growth, self determination and health.
We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…
As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.
To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…
To assist communities in reaching their potential by providing immediate relief to people in need assessing their situations and providing solutions that lead to economic stability.
To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.
Community services, incorporated's mission is to empower the people of need in northwest missouri to achieve their goals and improve their quality of life.
To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Joplin and the most unlike its peers is Wildcat Glades Nature Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds PRO MUSICA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds Connect2Culture ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO ↗
- Who funds JOPLIN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP ↗
- Who funds JOPLIN FAMILY Y ↗
- Who funds LIFECHOICES ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ART FEEDS JOPLIN ↗
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN ↗
- Who funds JOPLIN NALA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The United Way of Southwest Missouri · Arvest Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Carthage Area United Way · Jasper County Association for Social Ser · Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.