How much did FREEMAN R JOHNSON TRUST grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of FREEMAN R JOHNSON TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$1.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS$5,000
LAFAYETTE HOUSE$4,400
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOPLIN$3,730
DOWNTOWN JOPLIN ALLIANCE$3,000
JOPLIN NALA READ$3,000
JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$3,000
COMMUNITY CLINIC$3,000
PROMUSICA$3,000
CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SW MO$2,500
HIGHER POWER GARAGE$2,500
ASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES$2,500
JASPER COUNTY CASA$2,500
THE ALLIANCE OF SWMO$2,500
OZARK TRAILS COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS$2,500
WILDCAT GLADES FRIENDS GROUP$2,475

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$254k · 27 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$254k

$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%

+0%

Still filing today

37%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureCrime & LegalEnvironmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GA
GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS
3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +17%
JA
JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND
5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +53% · 80% of their budget
JC
JASPER COUNTY CASA
5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +517%

Funded once

TC
THE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF SW MO
one grant, 2020 · $8k
FS
FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +0%
AR
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SW MO
one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Main Street Joplin

Main street joplin, d/b/a downtown joplin alliance, is a not-for-profit corporation founded to enhance the economic development of the downtown business district of joplin, mo.

Community Improvement

Jefferson City Rape

The mission of the jefferson city rape & abuse crisis service, inc. shall be to support survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking through advocacy, counseling and shelter services in a space designed for healing and hope.

—

Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economic prosperity and quality of life in the joplin region, and to be the principal advocate for, and provider of services to its business community

—

Joplin Family Y

Under the guidance of christian principles, the joplin family y seeks to serve the community by providing an environment and activities that enable all people to achieve their full potential through the development of spirit, body and mind.

Human Services

Casa of Jefferson and Gilpin Counties

To provide specially selected and trained community volunteers toadvocate for abused and neglected children in the pursuit of safe andpermanent homes.

Civil Rights

Jefferson Council On Aging Inc

Jcoa is responsible for advocacy and planning a comprehensive and coordinated variety of services that are available to approximately 107,000 persons age 60+ in jefferson parish. jcoa is managed by a professional staff that is supervised…

Human Services

Victims Assistance Center of Jefferson

To assist and provide direct services to victims/survivors of violence and crime in jefferson county.

Human Services

Josephy Center for Arts and Culture

To be a welcoming, attractive and functional space that thousands of wallowa county residents and visitors use each year to view art, listen to music, watch theater and other performances, engage in workshops and classes in the visual and…

Arts & Culture

Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce

Founded to further charitable, scientific,literacy, civic, athletic, patriotic, cultural, social and educational purposes.

Education

Joplin Humane Society Inc

To promote the humane care and protection of all animals, especially those abandoned, neglected and abused; and to prevent cruelty and suffering of all animals.

Animals

Joplin Business and Industrial

Development of jobs in the joplin, mo area

Community Improvement

Crosslines Churches of the Joplin Area

The organization provides emergency services that improve the overall health and welfare of very low and low income individuals and families in the joplin, carl junction, and webb city areas.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Self Help Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Higher Power Garage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/15

Grantees still filing

12/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$222,850Arts & Culture$24,500Crime & Legal$12,800Environment$11,975Health$5,500Public Safety & Disaster$4,500Youth Development$3,730

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable TrustWI31.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Arvest Foundation · Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The United Way of Southwest Missouri · The Bramlage and Willcoxon Foundation · Freeman Health System

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FREEMAN R JOHNSON TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +53% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 440563902 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 80% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Freeman R Johnson Trust?

Find your warmest path to Freeman R Johnson Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FREEMAN R JOHNSON TRUST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Freeman R Johnson Trust?

More from the funding graph

FREEMAN R JOHNSON TRUST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Freeman R Johnson Trust?

More from the funding graph