· Private foundation
Jim and Carol Gaskill Memorial Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS | $45,000 |
| MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| WEBB CITY R-7 SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| PITT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| ST PETERS CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF WEBB CITY | $10,000 |
| JOPLIN AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS | $10,000 |
| CHARLIE 22 OUTDOORS | $5,000 |
| JOPLIN HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| CROSSLINE MINISTRIES OF JOPLIN | $5,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS JASPER | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN LEGION | $5,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $5,000 |
| VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 7630 | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -99% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $50k · revenue +72%
- POPETERSON OUTDOORS MINISTRIES5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +30%
- C2Charlie 22 Outdoors5× · 2021–2025 · $37k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- SPST PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCone grant, 2021 · $10k
- JRJOPLIN REGIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATIOone grant, 2021 · $10k
- SFSAVEOURHERITAGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.
To decrease the incidence of domestic violence and sexual assault in saline county, missouri, through community awareness, counseling, shelter, direct services and support groups.
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.
Sunshine ministries is committed to providing high-quality christian social services to the poor and needy of st. louis by offering healing from the past, help for the present and hope for the future. see schedule o for continuation.
The society enhances independence, empowers individuals and enriches the lives of people who are visually impaired or blind.
Homesafe provides safe, temorary shelter, and support services for indivduals who have suffered or have been threatened with emotional or physical abuse.
To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.
The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…
Benevolence to families of members of the missouri state highway patrol who die in the line of duty
To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, evidence-based, trauma-informed, quality behavioral healthcare solutions.
To offer a christ centered way out of a seemingly hopeless situation for victims of domestic violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Self Help Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Higher Power Garage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEBB CITY R-7 SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PETERSON OUTDOORS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Charlie 22 Outdoors ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds LIFECHOICES ↗
- Who funds Joplin Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DARRIS S SCHALK POST 322 ↗
- Who funds JOPLIN WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES CONNECTIONS FOR SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds HIGHER POWER GARAGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Arvest Foundation · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Dawson Heritage Foundation 30535007936 · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · The Minneapolis Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jim and Carol Gaskill Memorial Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.