Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$134kHealth$71kHuman Services$61kArts & Culture$29kYouth Development$10kReligion$10kCommunity Improvement$7kCrime & Legal$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$827k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION$2,500
PROMUSICA$2,500
CONNECT2CULTURE$2,500
FAMILY SELF-HELP CENTER INC$2,500
CHILDRENS CENTER OF SW MISSOURI$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SW MISSOURI$2,025
JOPLIN LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN$2,000
FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM$2,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF JOPLIN$2,000
REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE ASSOC$1,500
LIFE CHOICE MEDICAL SERVICES$1,500
BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN$1,500
WILDCAT GLADES FRIENDS GROUP$1,500
VITA NOVA VILLAGE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 8%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $3k → 15%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $3k → 18%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $2k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 15%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $2k → 18%VITA NOVA VILLAGE: $2k → 18%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $2k → 18%WATERED GARDENS: $1k → 18%VITA NOVA VILLAGE: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$323k · 35 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
19

Total granted

$323k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-5%

Still filing today

57%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +110%
  • FS
    FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +0%
  • PM
    PRO MUSICA
    7× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH OF JOPLIN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • MS
    MAIN STREET JOPLIN DBA--
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • RH
    RAPHA HOUSE TRAVIS BUCHAN
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economic prosperity and quality of life in the joplin region, and to be the principal advocate for, and provider of services to its business community

2
Joplin Business and Industrial Development Corporation

Development of jobs in the joplin, mo area

Community Improvement
3
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
4
Crosslines Churches of the Joplin Area

The organization provides emergency services that improve the overall health and welfare of very low and low income individuals and families in the joplin, carl junction, and webb city areas.

Human Services
5
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
6
Jefferson Area Community Outreach for Older People

Help seniors maintain healthy, secure and independent lifestyles by providing no cost supported services.

7
Solace House of the Ozarks Inc

Provide a safe home of care and comfort for end-of-life patients.

Human Services
8
Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation

Founded to further charitable, scientific,literacy, civic, athletic, patriotic, cultural, social and educational purposes.

Education
9
Mental Health Assoc in Jefferson County Inc

The mental health association is committed to individual service in a community based setting that promotes recovery, dignity, personal growth, self determination and health.

10
Freeman Neosho Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, quality healthcare solutions.

Health
11
Mercy Hospital Joplin

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
12
Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Joplin and the most unlike its peers is Rx Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health ServicesYouth Development Organizat…Joplin Community DevelopmentFaith-Based Health SystemsBusiness & Professional Ass…Trauma & Victim Support Ser…Regional Philanthropic Netw…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%5%<5yr12%10%5–10yr16%14%10–20yr15%33%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr23%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr12%7%5–10yr16%5%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr15%9%35–55yr23%58%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
11%
290/2,587

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC — $21,600 · OtherFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INCREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE — $14,000 · OtherREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFAREPRO MUSICA — $13,000 · OtherPRO MUSICACOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $12,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURIMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN — $12,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLINCHILDRENS CENTER OF SW MISSOURI — $11,612 · OtherCHILDRENS CENTER OF SW MISSOURIIndividual grant recipient — $10,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · OtherJOPLIN SCHOOLS — $7,500 · Other+31 more — $79,600 · Other+31 moreMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION — $104,500 · EducationMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATIONJOPLIN LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $6,160 · EducationJOPLIN LIBRARY FOUNDATION+2 more — $3,000 · EducationLIFECHOICES — $7,500 · HealthFREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM — $7,500 · HealthASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC — $2,600 · HealthRX Outreach Inc — $1,000 · HealthBright Futures Joplin — $9,000 · Human ServicesJOPLIN FAMILY Y — $2,500 · Human ServicesVITA NOVA VILLAGE — $2,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesWATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION — $1,000 · Human ServicesConnect2Culture — $7,500 · Arts & CultureGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $2,000 · Arts & CultureJASPER COUNTY CASA — $6,500 · Crime & LegalBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$190,212Education$113,660Health$18,600Human Services$17,500Arts & Culture$9,500Crime & Legal$6,500Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION — $104,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC — $21,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE — $14,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetPRO MUSICA — $13,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $12,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN — $12,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBright Futures Joplin — $9,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetConnect2Culture — $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIFECHOICES — $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA — $6,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND — $4,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY — $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI JOPLIN — $3,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC — $2,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJOPLIN FAMILY Y — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVITA NOVA VILLAGE — $2,500 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP — $2,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOPLIN HISTORICAL & MINERAL MUSEUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRX Outreach Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROWDER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET JOPLIN — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
  • Who funds REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE
  • Who funds PRO MUSICA
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN
  • Who funds Bright Futures Joplin
  • Who funds Connect2Culture
  • Who funds LIFECHOICES
  • Who funds FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM
  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY CASA
  • Who funds JOPLIN LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS
  • Who funds JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY
  • Who funds NAMI JOPLIN
  • Who funds ASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC
  • Who funds JOPLIN FAMILY Y
  • Who funds VITA NOVA VILLAGE
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds WILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable TrustWI53.9× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Arvest Foundation · Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust · The Bramlage and Willcoxon Foundation · The Farber Foundation · Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Freeman Health System

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Community Support Services Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph