· Community foundation
The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound
To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k45 grants · $326k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k25 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $575k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Way of Thurston County | $320,928 |
| Boys & Girls Club Thurston | $254,358 |
| Mason County HOST | $239,994 |
| Griffin School Foundation | $163,734 |
| Capitol Land Trust | $152,973 |
| Thurston County Food Bank | $136,298 |
| South Puget Sound H4H | $113,390 |
| Concern for Animals | $95,657 |
| SafePlace | $75,922 |
| Puget Sound Estuarium | $75,011 |
| Senior Services for S Sound | $71,947 |
| North Thurston Education Fund | $70,892 |
| Family Education & Support | $70,101 |
| Hands On Childrens Museum | $69,609 |
| Pope John Paul II High School | $69,209 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
190 repeat relationships — 103 still active in FY2024, 87 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $353k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THURSTON COUNTY8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +37%
- MCMason County Housing Options for Students in Transition5× · 2018–2024 · $516k · revenue +16% · 50% of their budget
- TCTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK8× · 2017–2024 · $462k · revenue +118%
Funded once
- PEPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAone grant, 2017 · $47k
- PMPACIFIC MOUNTAIN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +22%
- OROCOSTA RECREATION CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.
Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.
Futurewise works throughout Washington state to encourage healthy, equitable and opportunity-rich communities, and to protect our most valuable farmlands, forests and water resources through wise land use policies and practices.
Foster Growth in the Community
RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.
The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Stewardship Partners helps private landowners restore and preserve the natural landscapes of WA State. We collaborate with diverse interest groups to build bridges and find solutions that achieve mutual goals of environmental protection,…
The organization's mission is growing food justice through collective action. the organization's vision is ending hunger in washington state.
Founded in 1994, PSCS is a small, independent middle and high school located in the Chinatown/International District of downtown Seattle. PSCS is committed to co-creating a brave space for community-centered education, critical curriculum,…
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Performance Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
248 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 248 of the 316 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THURSTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THURSTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Mason County Housing Options for Students in Transition ↗
- Who funds THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES FOR SOUTH SOUND ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Olympia Symphony Orchestra ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NISQUALLY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
- Who funds SOUTH PUGET SOUND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds STUDENT ORCHESTRAS OF GREATER OLYMPIA ↗
- Who funds THE OLYMPIA FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NORTH THURSTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF OLYMPIA ↗
- Who funds THE GRIFFIN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sidewalk ↗
- Who funds Concern for Animals ↗
- Who funds HANDS ON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SOUND ESTUARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH WORKS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEWIS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HARLEQUIN PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES FIRST ↗
- Who funds GREAT BEND CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN GARDEN PROJECT INC GARDEN-RAISED BOUNTY ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SOUND READING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAYDAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILD GRIEF ↗
- Who funds The Washington Center for the Performing Arts ↗
- Who funds OLYMPIA ECOSYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds SOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Family Support Center of South Sound ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dawkins Charitable Trust · Thurston County Economic Development Cou · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of Thurston County · Pacific Mountain Workforce Development Council · School's Out Washington · Renah Blair Rietzke Family Foundation · Inatai Foundation · The Finninsula Foundation Inc Co Ted Sandler · Grays Harbor Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northwest Youth Corps — 100% of income from government
- Rural Development Initiatives Inc — 11% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.