Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

Ludlow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
64%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$4,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$8,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 13
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$595k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 64% of the organizations Ludlow Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 80% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$40k36%
FY202411$40k64%
FY20237$20k29%
FY202112$41k50%
FY202013$33k46%
FY201910$28k60%
FY201811$28k55%
FY201711$30kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$103kFood & Nutrition$61kHuman Services$48kHealth$19kCivil Rights$10kReligion$10kYouth Development$6kEducation$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 28 grantees
All grantees of Ludlow Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Acres of Diamonds$18,50060%
Rebuilding Together Thurston County$16,35073%
Katie's Handprint$13,0001n/a
Farms for Life$13,00057%
Wasilla Area Seniors Inc$13,00020%
Upper Valley Mend$10,00020%
Interfaith Works$10,00050%
West Seattle Food Bank$8,00020%
Safeplace$7,00040%
Kitchen Garden Project Inc Garden-Raised Bounty$6,85030%
Food Bank of Alaska$6,50020%
Homes First$6,35020%
Kids Kupboard$6,00020%
Vine Maple Place$5,00020%
Greater Spokane County Meals on Wheels$5,00010%
Walla Walla Alliance for the Homeless$4,00011%
Northwest Harvest Emm$4,00010%
The Salvation Army$3,5001n/a
West Seattle Helpline$3,50010%
The Bangsund Dwelling Place Nfp$3,00011%
Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative$2,35010%
South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity$2,35010%
Beans Cafe Inc$2,00010%
YWCA of Olympia$2,00010%
Sidewalk$2,00010%
Gridiron Foundation$1,0001n/a
United States Catholic Conference$1,0001n/a
Panza$50010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 20 recipients with no EIN on record ($84k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ludlow Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAcres of Diamonds: $18,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRebuilding Together Thurston County: $16,350 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetFarms for Life: $13,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetWasilla Area Seniors Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUpper Valley Mend: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Works: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWest Seattle Food Bank: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSafeplace: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKitchen Garden Project Inc Garden-Raised Bounty: $6,850 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFood Bank of Alaska: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomes First: $6,350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKids Kupboard: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVine Maple Place: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Spokane County Meals on Wheels: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWalla Walla Alliance for the Homeless: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorthwest Harvest Emm: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Seattle Helpline: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Bangsund Dwelling Place Nfp: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetInnovations Human Trafficking Collaborative: $2,350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSouth Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity: $2,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeans Cafe Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA of Olympia: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSidewalk: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPanza: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 24.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of South Puget SoundWA26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound · The Norcliffe Foundation · Thurston County Economic Development Cou · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Dawkins Charitable Trust · Multicare Health System · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · United Way of Thurston County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ludlow Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ludlow Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ludlow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Ludlow Foundation

How much does Ludlow Foundation give?
Ludlow Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $40,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Ludlow Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (40%), Food & Nutrition (24%), Human Services (18%).
Who are Ludlow Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Acres of Diamonds ($19k), Rebuilding Together Thurston County ($16k), Katie's Handprint ($13k).
Does Ludlow Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 64% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Ludlow Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ludlow Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound, The Norcliffe Foundation, Thurston County Economic Development Cou.
Where is Ludlow Foundation based?
Ludlow Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ludlow’s filings →

More from the funding graph