· Private foundation
Gesner Johnson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k13 grants · $403k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $307k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUTDOOR OUTREACH | $56,275 |
| WORLD RELIEF WESTERN WASHINGTON | $50,400 |
| YOUR NEIGHBOR TO LOVE COALITION | $50,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY & PSYCHOLOGY | $50,000 |
| HOPE REFUGE INC | $50,000 |
| URBAN IMPACT | $49,550 |
| SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE | $45,000 |
| TESTIMONY GOSPEL BRAND MINISTRIES INC | $40,000 |
| JOURNEY HOUSE | $40,000 |
| GIRLS RISING ABOVE CHILD EXPLOITATION (GRACE) | $39,000 |
| CURA SMILES INC | $33,530 |
| OUR ARTS FOUNDATION | $31,689 |
| UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY | $30,000 |
| AGROS INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $403k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BEBOTH ENDS BELIEVING INC4× · 2020–2023 · $185k · revenue +78%
- UIUrban Impact5× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +107%
- JIJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH4× · 2019–2022 · $138k · revenue +99%
Funded once
BALLARD FOOD BANKgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +57%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $70k
- GHGOING HOME IIone grant, 2024 · $68k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…
To lift people of out homelessness, one person, one family at a time.
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…
Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…
The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Our Arts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOTH ENDS BELIEVING INC ↗
- Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
- Who funds Leadership Development DBA Centered ↗
- Who funds Urban Impact ↗
- Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds AGROS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Our Arts Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BALLARD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds GOING HOME II ↗
- Who funds Businesses Ending Slavery & Trafficking ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS EMPOWERING YOUTH N E Y ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds OUTDOOR OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds EPIDAURUS DBA AMITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds CRISTA Ministries ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Ahmanson Foundation · Ann Peppers Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Country Friends · Alliance Healthcare Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gesner Johnson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Going Home Ii — 100% of income from government
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gesner Johnson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Gesner Johnson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.