Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center

Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center (Washington) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $670,335 to it, the largest being GARY E MILGARD FAMILY FOUNDATION-CARI ($150,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$3.3M
Funders on record
27
Grants received
$670k
Net assets
$1.2M
12/27 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%
01What it does

What Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center does

Mission

Rebuilding Hope offers support toward healing through advocacy and therapy for those affected by sexual assault abuse and commercial sexual exploitation. Through education and collaboration Rebuilding Hope improves the communitys response to sexual assault and abuse victims and challenges the behaviors and beliefs that promote sexual violence.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Advocacy- Free confidential and client-driven specialize sexual assault victim advocacy services including 24 7 crisis intervention information referral general medical and legal advocacy through phone chat or in-person support. These services are available to victims of sexual assault abuse and their loved ones regardless of when the assault or abuse occurred.

    $622,793 spent$2,450 earned by the program
    24% of program spending
  2. Therapy- Specialized sexual assault trauma-focused evidence-based mental health therapy is provided to adolescent and adult survivors of sexual assault and abuse as well as those close to them. The length of treatment cost and treatment approach is determined by the needs of the client. Over 90% of clients see some improvement in as little as 3 sessions with a significant reduction or elimination of PTSD symptoms occurring for most within 14 weeks.

    $533,073 spentof which $19 as grants$103,785 earned by the program
    21% of program spending
  3. Trafficking- Specialized wrap-around case management and advocacy services for youth and adults who have experienced or are at-risk of commercial sexual exploitation sex trafficking that offers access to basic needs services and amenities to support clients opportunities to self-actualize their goals for healing and safety.

    $584,407 spentof which $202,397 as grants
    23% of program spending
  4. Education- Free evidence-based and - informed prevention education curriculum made available to youths and adults across Pierce County. Education topics include sexual harassment and bystander intervention sexual assault and rape commercial sexual exploitation healthy relationships and cybersexual harassment. While we work to respond to every individual request for prevention education we aim to provide prevention curriculum through multiple sessions with repeated dosage to audiences in order to increase the rate of change in beliefs and perceptions that can perpetuate sexual assault. Professional training and technical assistance is also provided as a fee-for-service.

    $819,819 spent$2,758 earned by the program
    32% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,560,092.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($407k)2022 Revenue 159 ($1.8M) Expenses 126 ($1.3M) Net assets 219 ($894k)2023 Revenue 135 ($1.6M) Expenses 147 ($1.6M) Net assets 217 ($886k)2024 Revenue 228 ($2.6M) Expenses 224 ($2.4M) Net assets 276 ($1.1M)2025 Revenue 284 ($3.3M) Expenses 304 ($3.2M) Net assets 285 ($1.2M)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (284)Expenses (304)Net assets (285)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.1M to $3.0M (+161%).

$467k
$980k
$1.1M
$3.0M
$3.2M
20212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 81% · 2022 82% · 2023 82% · 2024 85% · 2025 74%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$86k
’21
$486k
’22
−$977
’23
$240k
’24
$35k
’25
0.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Carlyn Sampson

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

20212022202320242025
Listed1212141311
Joined·+6+7+3+2
No longer listed·6544
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $8k → $10k.

7 of 27 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

22%
largest funder
41%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 69% · 2019 33% · 2020 42% · 2021 66% · 2022 32% · 2023 49% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

22% of Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

54% of Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
MN
WI
CO
DE
AZ
AL
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $98k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 9%Fundraising 12%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center?
Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center (Washington) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $670,335 to it, the largest being GARY E MILGARD FAMILY FOUNDATION-CARI ($150,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center have?
IRS filings report 27 organizations giving $670,335 in grants to Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center?
GARY E MILGARD FAMILY FOUNDATION-CARI is the largest funder on record, with $150,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 27 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing