Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stanley E Hanson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$4.7MHealth$4.0MYouth Development$3.4MCrime & Legal$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.0MEducation$889kHuman Services$882kInternational$865kOther$0
02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $507k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATION$1,400,000
FREEDOM ALLIANCE$150,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$100,000
THORN$100,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$100,000
ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$65,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
NO KID HUNGRY BY SHARE OUR STRENGTH$50,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$50,000
VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO$50,000
EVERFREE$50,000
NASHVILLE WINE AUCTION$50,000
EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION$50,000
YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $3k → 8%HONOR FLIGHT INC: $5k → 15%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $3k → 8%THE RED ROAD INC: $25k → 4%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 17%NO BIRTHDAY LEFT BEHIND: $5k → 10%NO BIRTHDAY LEFT BEHIND: $5k → 10%THE RED ROAD INC: $25k → 4%NO BIRTHDAY LEFT BEHIND: $3k → 10%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $5k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $3k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $3k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $3k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $3k → 11%SHOW HOPE: $25k → 4%ABILITIES UNITED: $20k → 8%FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $25k → 14%ABILITIES UNITED: $20k → 8%FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 14%ABILITIES UNITED: $10k → 8%SHARE OUR SELVES CORPORATION: $5k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $10k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%THORN: $200k → 14%THORN: $200k → 14%THORN: $100k → 14%TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%FULLFILMENT FUND: $25k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $5k → 14%THE TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%THORN: $200k → 14%THORN: $100k → 14%THORN: $100k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%THORN: $100k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THORN: $100k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ND
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
HI
OK
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 112 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

112 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 67 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
97

Total granted

$16M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+43%

Still filing today

86%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $585k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +83%
  • T
    THORN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +417%
  • TE
    THE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • SI
    SOCIAL IMPACT FUNDCITY OF KINDNESS
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • SH
    STARKEY HEARING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
4
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
5
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
6
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

10
Social Current Inc

Social current's mission as developed and approved by its board of directors is to advocate for and implement equitable solutions to society's toughest challenges through collaboration, innovation, policy, and practice excellence.

Human Services
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsPublic Library OperationsLgbtq+ Community SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterEquine Therapy ProgramsLocal Food System Organizat…Women & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportSenior Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Environmental Conservation …Local History MuseumsDomestic Violence ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Cancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%3%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%34%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%15%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/178
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,800

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 167 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
162/167
Grantees still filing
110/167
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATION — $3,090,000 · OtherPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATIONSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $650,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES Living Proof C — $400,000 · OtherWATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN — $444,350 · Other+119 more — $6,079,125 · Other+119 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $900,000 · HealthChildren's Hos…Starkey Hearing Foundation — $350,000 · HealthStarkey Hearin…Jessie Rees Foundation — $285,000 · HealthJessie Rees Fo…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $265,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…CURE DUCHENNE — $175,000 · HealthCURE DUCHENNEPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC — $125,000 · HealthNEW DIRECTIONS FOR WOMEN INC — $102,500 · Health+14 more — $427,500 · Health+14 moreTHE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION — $1,075,000 · PhilanthropyTHE EMERIL L…Social Impact Fund — $745,000 · PhilanthropySocial Impac…SIMA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND — $255,000 · PhilanthropySIMA ENVIRON…+7 more — $210,000 · Philanthropy+7 moreTHORN — $1,100,000 · Human ServicesTHORNTODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $190,000 · Human ServicesTODD ANGLIN…EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $165,000 · Human ServicesEDWARD CHAR…FULFILLMENT FUND — $130,000 · Human ServicesFULFILLMENT…SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE — $75,000 · Human Services+14 more — $355,000 · Human Services+14 moreORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 · Crime & Legal+4 more — $80,000 · Crime & LegalTHRIVE SCHOLARS — $225,000 · EducationTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION — $75,000 · EducationWHITTIER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationMERRIMANS CULINARY SCHOLARSHIP — $50,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $50,000 · EducationLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL — $30,000 · EducationCOSANTI FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Education+6 more — $67,500 · EducationSurvivor Mitzvah Project — $385,000 · InternationalFREEDOM ALLIANCE — $150,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $107,500 · International+5 more — $50,000 · International
Other$10,663,475Health$2,630,000Philanthropy$2,285,000Human Services$2,015,000Crime & Legal$1,580,000Education$707,500International$692,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATION — $3,090,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTHORN — $1,100,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetTHE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION — $1,075,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $900,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSocial Impact Fund — $745,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $650,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN — $444,350 over 8y, 14% of budgetSurvivor Mitzvah Project — $385,000 over 8y, 9.0% of budgetStarkey Hearing Foundation — $350,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetJessie Rees Foundation — $285,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $265,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND — $255,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetFestival of Children Foundation — $250,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetEarly Alert Canines — $250,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS — $225,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $190,000 over 8y, 98% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $185,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE — $175,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $165,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS — $162,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND — $160,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEFUL FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetUNITED WAYS OF CALIFORNIA — $150,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER — $150,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND — $130,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC — $125,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $107,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS FOR WOMEN INC — $102,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFOOD FINDERS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MINOT INC — $100,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetC5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $95,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER — $90,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetONeill Sea Odyssey — $90,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER INC — $90,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCOAST SPORTS ASSOCIATES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 48% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION — $75,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDreamCatcher Wild Horse and Burro Sanctuary Inc — $72,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THORN
  • Who funds THE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds Social Impact Fund
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds WATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN
  • Who funds Survivor Mitzvah Project
  • Who funds Starkey Hearing Foundation
  • Who funds Jessie Rees Foundation
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SIMA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND
  • Who funds Festival of Children Foundation
  • Who funds Early Alert Canines
  • Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds CURE DUCHENNE
  • Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND
  • Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOMEFUL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAYS OF CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER
  • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE
  • Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA44.1× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Living Legacy Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · The Chuck and Ernestina Kreutzkamp Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Orange County's United Way · G Harbaugh Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stanley E Hanson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 46%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge100% of income from government
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc46% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc21% of income from government
  • Team River Runner Incorporated19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stanley E Hanson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stanley E Hanson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 230 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph