· Private foundation
The Stanley E Hanson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $507k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATION | $1,400,000 |
| FREEDOM ALLIANCE | $150,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $100,000 |
| THORN | $100,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED | $100,000 |
| ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $65,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $60,000 |
| NO KID HUNGRY BY SHARE OUR STRENGTH | $50,000 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO | $50,000 |
| EVERFREE | $50,000 |
| NASHVILLE WINE AUCTION | $50,000 |
| EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
112 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 67 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $585k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OFORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +83%
- TTHORN8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +417%
- TETHE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +125%
Funded once
- SISOCIAL IMPACT FUNDCITY OF KINDNESSone grant, 2017 · $150k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $150k
- SHSTARKEY HEARING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…
Social current's mission as developed and approved by its board of directors is to advocate for and implement equitable solutions to society's toughest challenges through collaboration, innovation, policy, and practice excellence.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 167 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THORN ↗
- Who funds THE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds Social Impact Fund ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds WATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Survivor Mitzvah Project ↗
- Who funds Starkey Hearing Foundation ↗
- Who funds Jessie Rees Foundation ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SIMA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND ↗
- Who funds Festival of Children Foundation ↗
- Who funds Early Alert Canines ↗
- Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds TODD ANGLIN HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds CURE DUCHENNE ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEFUL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAYS OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Living Legacy Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · The Chuck and Ernestina Kreutzkamp Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Orange County's United Way · G Harbaugh Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stanley E Hanson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge — 100% of income from government
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
- Team River Runner Incorporated — 19% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stanley E Hanson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Stanley E Hanson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.