Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

June Irene Chiltern Healey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$496kHuman Services$58kReligion$50kHousing & Shelter$18kHealth$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $47k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
WILDLIFE LEARNING CENTER$12,000
OPERATION BLANKETS OF LOVE$10,000
KITTEN RESCUE$10,000
NATURE OF WILDWORKS$9,000
THE MAGIC JUNGLE$5,000
PROJECT SURVIVAL$5,000
GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA$5,000
KITTY OF ANGELS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PEOPLE CONCERN: $6k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $3k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $12k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $6k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$589k · 18 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$589k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

56%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America
    8× · 2018–2025 · $53k · revenue +17%
  • KR
    KITTEN RESCUE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +1%
  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • EF
    EXOTIC FELINE BREEDING COMPOUNDINC
    one grant, 2019 · $17k
  • G
    GLAZA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • WL
    Wildlife Learning Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
2
Raskels Rescue
Animals
3
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
4
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

5
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
6
Realtors to the Rescue

Animal Rescue

7
Jl Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
8
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
9
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
10
Where the Wild Things Are Rescue in

The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.

Animals
11
Enchanted Tails Animal Rescue

To rescue cat and dog rescue in kent county area

Animals
12
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rescue Train and the most unlike its peers is Canine Hope for Heroes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
6/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEAVEN ON EARTH — $62,750 · OtherHEAVEN ON EARTHMAGIC JUNGLE INC — $46,000 · OtherMAGIC JUNGLE INCWILDLIFE LEARNING CENTER — $42,000 · OtherWILDLIFE LEARNING CENTEROPERATION BLANKETS OF LOVE (OBOL) — $40,000 · OtherOPERATION BLANKETS OF LOVE (OBOL)Individual grant recipient — $31,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEXOTIC FELINE BREEDING COMPOUND'S FELINE CONSERVATION CENTER — $19,000 · OtherEXOTIC FELINE BREEDING COMPOUND'S FELINE CONSERVATI…EXOTIC FELINE BREEDING COMPOUNDINC — $17,400 · OtherEXOTIC FELINE BREEDING COMPOUNDINCGLAZA — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherCAT HAVEN — $12,000 · Other+1 more — $10,000 · OtherKarma Rescue — $68,000 · AnimalsKarma RescueCANINE HOPE FOR HEROES INC — $34,000 · AnimalsCANINE HOPE FOR HEROES INCKITTEN RESCUE — $30,000 · AnimalsKITTEN RESCUEMORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · AnimalsMORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INCHOPE FOR PAWS — $25,000 · AnimalsHOPE FOR PAWSGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $22,500 · AnimalsGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONTHE RESCUE TRAIN — $15,000 · AnimalsTHE RESCUE TRAINWildlife Learning Foundation — $10,000 · AnimalsAll About Equine Animal Rescue Inc — $10,000 · Animals+3 more — $14,000 · Animals+3 moreInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $53,000 · Human ServicesInternatio…THE PEOPLE CONCERN — $9,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE…THE NATURE OF WILDWORKS — $40,000 · EnvironmentOperation Blankets Of Love — $10,000 · EducationPROJECT SURVIVAL — $5,000 · Science & Tech
Other$310,150Animals$253,500Human Services$62,000Environment$40,000Education$10,000Science & Tech$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKarma Rescue — $68,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $53,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE OF WILDWORKS — $40,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCANINE HOPE FOR HEROES INC — $34,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetKITTEN RESCUE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHOPE FOR PAWS — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RESCUE TRAIN — $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWildlife Learning Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetAll About Equine Animal Rescue Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOperation Blankets Of Love — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKitty of Angels Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetWags and Walks — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SURVIVAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Karma Rescue
  • Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America
  • Who funds THE NATURE OF WILDWORKS
  • Who funds CANINE HOPE FOR HEROES INC
  • Who funds KITTEN RESCUE
  • Who funds MORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HOPE FOR PAWS
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds EXOTIC FELINE BREEDING COMPOUNDINC
  • Who funds THE RESCUE TRAIN
  • Who funds Wildlife Learning Foundation
  • Who funds All About Equine Animal Rescue Inc
  • Who funds Operation Blankets Of Love
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN
  • Who funds Kitty of Angels Inc
  • Who funds Wags and Walks
  • Who funds PROJECT SURVIVAL
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare FoundationCA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization June Irene Chiltern Healey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to June Irene Chiltern Healey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to June Irene Chiltern Healey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph