· Public charity
Hope for Paws
HOPE FOR PAWS rescues dogs and all other animals who are suffering on the streets and in shelters.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $285,152 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $310,776 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,624 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $82k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $203k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA ANIMAL RESCUE | $143,348 |
| MAISON SURE FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| THE LITTLE RED DOG INC | $36,600 |
| MAUI CAT RESCUE | $15,000 |
| LAST CHANCE DOG RANCH | $10,204 |
| FOR THE LOVE OF STREET DOGS | $10,000 |
| KITT CRUSADERS INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KBKITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS2× · 2018–2019 · $150k · revenue +118%
- FIFixNation Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +28%
- TFTHE FORGOTTEN DOG FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $73k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- AOACE OF HEARTSgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue +87%
- RFRESCUE FROM THE HARTone grant, 2018 · $30k
- CRCOSTA RICA DOG RESCUEone grant, 2018 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Saving dogs
Dog rescue
Rescue animals
Animal rescue
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Forgotten Dog Foundation and the most unlike its peers is For the Love of Street Dogs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 37% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds KITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS ↗
- Who funds FOXY AND THE HOUNDS ↗
- Who funds FixNation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FORGOTTEN DOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHELTER TRANSPORT ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM ↗
- Who funds MAUI CAT RESCUE ↗
- Who funds MAISON SURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACE OF HEARTS ↗
- Who funds Little Red Dog Inc ↗
- Who funds AT-CHOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bunny World Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Wetlands and Wildlife Care Center ↗
- Who funds PAW PRINTS IN THE SAND INC ↗
- Who funds Avian Underdogs Rescue Association ↗
- Who funds LAST CHANCE DOG RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds FOR THE LOVE OF STREET DOGS ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Operation Blankets Of Love ↗
- Who funds ESKIE RESCUERS UNITED AMERICAN ESKIMO DOG RESCUE ↗
- Who funds CANINE LYMPHOMA EDUCATION AWARENESS AND RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds Much Love Animal Rescue ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BIG BONES CANINE RESCUE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MARLEY'S MUTTS DOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds HOLLYWOOD HUSKIES ↗
- Who funds DREAM TEAM ANGELS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds NORCAL BULLY BREED RESCUE ↗
- Who funds FROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds DHARMA RESCUE FOR CATS AND DOGS ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Good Charities · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · The Diane Warren Foundation · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · Petco Love · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · The Sussman Family Foundation Inc · Pedigree Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hope for Paws funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.