· Private foundation
Chauncey and Marion D McCormick Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of CHAUNCEY AND MARION D MCCORMICK FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $543k
- $50k–250k34 grants · $2.7M
- $250k+3 grants · $965k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCY INC | $350,000 |
| DONORS TRUST | $322,500 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $292,500 |
| NOURISHING HOPE | $200,000 |
| ALL CHICAGO | $200,000 |
| CHICAGO CITY DAY SCHOOL | $150,000 |
| ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO | $150,000 |
| OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL | $150,000 |
| RECIPE FOR CHANGE | $100,000 |
| RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $100,000 |
| VIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TRUST INC | $95,000 |
| BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING & EDUCATION CENTER | $90,000 |
| THE BHUTAN FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| THE ARTS CLUB OF CHICAGO | $80,000 |
| BALLET THEATER FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BTBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $865k · revenue +45%
- TATHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO6× · 2020–2025 · $718k · revenue +32%
- TITHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE4× · 2020–2024 · $620k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- JHJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - LYME INSTITUTEone grant, 2020 · $175k
- CCColumbia College Chicagoone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +7%
- VMVIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TRUST INC - GENERAL OPERATINGone grant, 2021 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…
Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.
Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…
To encourage, sponsor, and promote innovative work in the arts created and presented by individuals, groups, and organizations.
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Arts Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Lucky Plush Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AFRICAN MEDICINE AND EDUC ↗
- Who funds BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
- Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
- Who funds SAFE REFUGE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds St Leonard's Ministries ↗
- Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
- Who funds THE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds READING BETWEEN THE LINES NFP ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR PAWS ↗
- Who funds The Bhutan Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW DAY FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN HOSPITAL OF PARIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTECITO FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
- Who funds RECIPE FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE JACKSON CHANCE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund · Reva and David Logan Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Poetry Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chauncey and Marion D McCormick Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Chauncey and Marion D McCormick Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Chauncey and Marion D McCormick Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.