Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

Connect2Culture

Connect2Culture (Missouri) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,798,332 to it, the largest being FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM ($1,732,835). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$831k
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$2.8M
Net assets
$575k
15/24 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 39%
01What it does

What Connect2Culture does

Mission

Connect2Culture strives to enrich the region by "igniting a passion for the arts, culture, and entertainment" as Joplin's community arts agency and a presenter of exceptional performances. See Schedule O for more information.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Connect2Culture was incorporated in 2010 to enhance the community through arts, culture, and entertainment. Since its founding, the organization has worked to grow and strengthen the regional arts ecosystem through advocacy, collaboration, and public programming. In 2013, Connect2Culture became Joplin's designated community arts agency, supporting and promoting local arts and cultural organizations. In 2016, Connect2Culture expanded its role to include presenting performing arts programming for the region. See Schedule O for additional program and mission information.

    $673,271 spent$247,961 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $673,271.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($185k) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 356 ($4.5M) Expenses 148 ($275k) Net assets 441 ($5.4M)2020 Revenue 259 ($3.2M) Expenses 508 ($942k) Net assets 628 ($7.7M)2021 Revenue 84 ($1.0M) Expenses 2184 ($4.0M) Net assets 384 ($4.7M)2022 Revenue 697 ($8.7M) Expenses 4978 ($9.2M) Net assets 342 ($4.2M)2023 Revenue 54 ($678k) Expenses 2387 ($4.4M) Net assets 37 ($451k)2024 Revenue 66 ($828k) Expenses 425 ($787k) Net assets 40 ($493k)2025 Revenue 66 ($831k) Expenses 407 ($755k) Net assets 47 ($575k)
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (66)Expenses (407)Net assets (47)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $4.2M to $451k (−89%).

$1.2M
$5.4M
$7.7M
$4.7M
$4.2M
$451k
$502k
$582k
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 2% · 2019 0% · 2024 9% · 2025 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

67% of Connect2Culture’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.1M
’17
$4.2M
’19
$2.3M
’20
−$3.0M
’21
−$502k
’22
−$3.7M
’23
$40k
’24
$76k
’25
7.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Emily Frankoski

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed2020151417181822
Joined··+2+1+6+1+3+4
No longer listed··723030
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $7k → $224k.

4 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $152k from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money Connect2Culture raised.

From the IRS filings of Connect2Culture’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Connect2Culture leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Connect2Culture.

62%
largest funder
80%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 77% · 2018 62% · 2019 87% · 2020 63% · 2021 46% · 2022 38% · 2023 49% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

35% of Connect2Culture's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

90% of Connect2Culture's grant income comes from Missouri funders.

WA
MN
WI
MO
KS
AR

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $160k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Connect2Culture runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 11,634 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin9% · above the median
Months of reserve7.5mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−5% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,634 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding Connect2Culture receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $20k on record.

Federal$20k
grants $20kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$20k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Connect2Culture

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

31%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Harry M Cornell Arts & Entertainment Complex · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Connect2Culture: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Connect2Culture?
Connect2Culture (Missouri) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,798,332 to it, the largest being FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM ($1,732,835). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Connect2Culture have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $2,798,332 in grants to Connect2Culture, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Connect2Culture?
FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM is the largest funder on record, with $1,732,835 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Connect2Culture find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing