Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$68kEducation$58kHuman Services$50kHealth$48kReligion$24kAnimals$14kCommunity Improvement$10kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$762k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION$7,000
GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS$5,000
CONNECT2CULTURE$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS$4,000
VERNON COUNTY CANCER RELIEF$3,000
LAFAYETTE HOUSE$2,500
BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN$2,500
CREATIVE LEARNING ALLIANCE$2,000
PRO MUSICA$1,000
JOPLIN HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
CENTAUR RISING$1,000
JASPER COUNTY CASA$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$1,000
JOPLIN LITTLE THEATER$1,000
CHILDRENS CENTER OF SW MO$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $750 → 15%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $1k → 18%OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA: $500 → 18%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $500 → 15%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $3k → 18%Area Agency On Aging-Region X: $500 → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 18%WATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 18%WATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 18%WATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 18%WATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 18%WATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$296k · 49 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
13

Total granted

$296k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+52%

Still filing today

55%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +110%
  • GA
    GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +85%
  • VC
    VERNON COUNTY CANCER RELIEF FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • RO
    RECOVERY OUTREACH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • HS
    HIGHER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jefferson County Humane Society Inc

Animal protection and preservation

Animals
2
Mental Health Assoc in Jefferson County Inc

The mental health association is committed to individual service in a community based setting that promotes recovery, dignity, personal growth, self determination and health.

3
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
4
Central Missouri Humane Society

Promotes the well-being of companion animals and pets that enrich the lives of the people who love them.

Animals
5
Humane Society of Jefferson County Inc

The mission of the humane society of jefferson county is to improve the lives of animals in need through compassionate care, adoption, advocacy and education while also inspiring humane communities that foster kindness and respect for all.

Animals
6
Jasper Mountain

To bring hope and healing to traumatized children and their families, and to enhance the physical, emotional, and spiritual health of its clients and staff.

Crime & Legal
7
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
8
Solace House of the Ozarks Inc

Provide a safe home of care and comfort for end-of-life patients.

Human Services
9
Jefferson City Rape and Abuse Crisis Service

The mission of the jefferson city rape & abuse crisis service, inc. shall be to support survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking through advocacy, counseling and shelter services in a space designed for healing and hope.

10
Jefferson County Service Organization Inc

Provide transportation, commodities, information and outreach to over 700 jefferson county, kansas residents.

11
Jefferson County Memorial Hospital Inc

Promote and provide quality healthcare for the general commuinty of Jefferson County

Health
12
Humane Society of the Ozarks Inc

Promote the humane treatment of animals

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Self Help Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Centaur Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealthcare & Community Serv…Member Recreation ClubsArts, Culture & Community D…Animal-Assisted Therapy and…Animal Welfare and Rescue S…Community Development Organ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%6%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr17%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr17%49%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/39
the rest of the field
12%
441/3,747

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC — $20,500 · OtherFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INCPRO MUSICA — $8,500 · OtherPRO MUSICAST PHILIPS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $7,000 · OtherFREEMAN HEALTH SYSYTEMS — $6,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER OF SW MISSOURI — $6,000 · OtherCONNECT2CULTURE — $5,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $5,000 · OtherJOPLIN LITTLE THEATER — $5,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER — $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $6,500 · Other+37 more — $61,200 · Other+37 moreMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION — $53,000 · EducationMISSOURI SOUTHERN F…THOMAS JEFFERSON INDEP DAY SCHOOL — $2,500 · EducationGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $39,500 · Arts & CultureGEORGE A SPIVA CE…Connect2Culture — $9,000 · Arts & CultureConnect2CultureVERNON COUNTY CANCER RELIEF FUND — $24,000 · HealthVERNON CO…FORE THE KIDS FOUNDATION — $1,500 · HealthFORE THE …Ozark Center — $1,250 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthOSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA — $8,500 · Human ServicesWATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION — $3,000 · Human ServicesBright Futures Joplin — $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,500 · Human ServicesJOPLIN FAMILY Y — $1,250 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $6,000 · AnimalsCENTAUR RISING — $3,600 · AnimalsJoplin Humane Society Inc — $3,000 · AnimalsRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalJASPER COUNTY CASA — $4,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST — $3,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$141,700Education$55,500Arts & Culture$48,500Health$27,250Human Services$17,250Animals$12,600Crime & Legal$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION — $53,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $39,500 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetVERNON COUNTY CANCER RELIEF FUND — $24,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC — $20,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetConnect2Culture — $9,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetOSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA — $8,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPRO MUSICA — $8,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $5,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Learning Alliance Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTAUR RISING — $3,600 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetWILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP — $3,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOPLIN TRAILS COALITION INC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetJoplin Humane Society Inc — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTER-MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE — $2,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON INDEP DAY SCHOOL — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBright Futures Joplin — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY — $1,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFORE THE KIDS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOzark Center — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOPLIN FAMILY Y — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAVER RANCH COMMUNITY INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND — $500 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds VERNON COUNTY CANCER RELIEF FUND
  • Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
  • Who funds Connect2Culture
  • Who funds OSAGE PRAIRIE YMCA
  • Who funds PRO MUSICA
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds Creative Learning Alliance Inc
  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY CASA
  • Who funds CENTAUR RISING
  • Who funds WILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP
  • Who funds WATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST
  • Who funds JOPLIN TRAILS COALITION INC
  • Who funds Joplin Humane Society Inc
  • Who funds INTER-MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON INDEP DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds Bright Futures Joplin

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust ServicesMO43.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Arvest Foundation · Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust · Freeman Health System · The United Way of Southwest Missouri · The Bramlage and Willcoxon Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Snider Wilson Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph