· Community foundation
Spanish Peaks Community Foundation
The SPANISH PEAKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION strategically directs the generous contributions of spanish peaks mountain club members to meet the needs and support the quality of life of those living and working in the big sky community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $407k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $685k
- $250k+1 grant · $251k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION | $251,320 |
| GALLATIN RIVER TASK FORCE | $180,000 |
| BIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT #72 | $170,000 |
| GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY | $125,000 |
| WELLNESS IN ACTION | $110,000 |
| BIG SKY COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST | $100,000 |
| BIG SKY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK-HRDC OF DISTRICT IX INC | $48,800 |
| ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY | $45,000 |
| GALLATIN RIVER CHILD CARE | $40,000 |
| DIRT CONCERN DBA SOUTHWEST MONTANA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION | $37,500 |
| BIG SKY SKI FOUNDATION | $31,000 |
| BRIDGERCARE | $30,000 |
| WARREN MILLER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $30,000 |
| EAGLE MOUNT | $25,000 |
| BIENVENIDOS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $379k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGGREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC2× · 2024–2025 · $175k · revenue +20%
- HRHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC2× · 2024–2025 · $74k · revenue +4%
- MLMORNINGSTAR LEARNING CENTER INC2× · 2024–2025 · $70k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BIG SKY COUNTRYone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
- CCCHILD CARE CONNECTIONS INCone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -63%
- BOBIG OPPORTUNITIESone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Serving as the voice of business, the big sky chamber of commerce champions a healthy economy and works collaboratively with community stakeholders as a conveyor and a catalyst to improve the overall quality of life in the region.
As the community's official destination management and marketing organization, visit big sky leads the development and promotion of authentic tourism experiences through research and stakeholder collaboration to grow big sky's economy…
A better big sky works to inform and engage montanans on issues related to public education, public lands access, voting rights, the environment, sustainable energy, women's health, tribal sovereignty, access to courts, economic justice,…
The purposes of the corporation shall be specifically to operate a statewide coordinated health information exchange and related services to enhance clinical care in the community and to improve and promote public health care in the…
To promote, stimulate, and advance the general welfare and economic development for billings, yellowstone county, and the state of montana.
To harness a piece of the cultural history and charm of a true Western event and offer it to the residents and vistors of Big Sky, Montana.
Enhancement and development of trails on public lands in Beaverhead County
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Big Sky Education and the most unlike its peers is Dirt Concern - Southwest Montana Mountain Bike Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Gallatin River Task Force ↗
- Who funds WELLNESS IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST BSCHT ↗
- Who funds GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC ↗
- Who funds MORNINGSTAR LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG SKY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Eagle Mount ↗
- Who funds Big Sky Rotary Foundation ↗
- Who funds BIENVENIDOS A GALLATIN VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BRIDGERCARE ↗
- Who funds DIRT CONCERN - SOUTHWEST MONTANA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BIG SKY COUNTRY ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds BIG OPPORTUNITIES ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC dba BIG SKY DISCOVERY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MONTANA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARKS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BIG SKY COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds GROW WILD INC ↗
- Who funds Northern Rocky Mountain Economic Development District ↗
- Who funds MT64 HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · Moonlight Community Foundation · One Valley Community Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Knight Foundation CO M Scholz · The Rieschel Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Michael D Arneson and Susan H Arneson · Greater Gallatin United Way Inc · Prometheus Charitable Trust · Otto Bremer Trust · Bozeman Deaconess Health Services
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Spanish Peaks Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.