· Private foundation
Pritchard Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF PENN - PENN MEDICINE | $100,000 |
| EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD | $75,000 |
| THE CONSCIOUS KID | $75,000 |
| SHARE OUR STRENGTH | $70,000 |
| WIND RIVER FOOD SOVEREIGNTY PROJECT | $50,000 |
| BRIDGERCARE | $50,000 |
| HORIZONS BRIDGEPORT | $50,000 |
| CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| PFLAG | $50,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CONNECTICUT | $50,000 |
| FAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| ALL OUR KIN | $50,000 |
| CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| EL EDUCATION | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES8× · 2018–2025 · $975k · revenue +665%
- EEEL EDUCATION INC4× · 2017–2025 · $785k · revenue +25%
- TTTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION3× · 2021–2023 · $700k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- HSHORIZONS STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAMone grant, 2020 · $118k
- HSHorizon Student Enrichment Programone grant, 2019 · $80k
- CFCENTER FOR POPULAR RESEARCH EDUCATION AND POLICY (C-PREP)one grant, 2024 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
Lowell school (the school) provides educational services to approximately 314 students in grades pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. the school strives to create a diverse, equitable, and inclusive learning environment, and offers a…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Expanded Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Everylibrary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EL EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALL OUR KIN INC ↗
- Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
- Who funds THE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds The Conscious Kid ↗
- Who funds PFLAG ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds The Petey Greene Program Inc ↗
- Who funds HAVERFORD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS BRIDGEPORT ↗
- Who funds FAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSATONIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BRIDGERCARE ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS ↗
- Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OUR SISTERS SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · Hillman Family Foundations · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Scotto Laporte Charitable Foundation · The O'Herron Family Foundation · Hilltop Foundation Inc · The Schifrin Foundation Inc · William and Cynthia Marcus Family Charitable Trust · The Near and Far Association Inc · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pritchard Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
- All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
- Our Sisters School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pritchard Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pritchard Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.