· Public charity
The Global Orphan Project Inc
The global orphan project exists to break the orphan cycle through the power of community, commerce, and the love of jesus.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $1,394,144 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,768,133 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,373,989 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $492k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $888k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PATRICK HENRY FAMILY SERVICES OPERATIONS | $215,438 |
| BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION | $201,000 |
| PROMISE686 INC | $125,328 |
| HEART OF THE BRIDE MINISTRIES INC | $100,564 |
| HARVEST FAMILY LIFE | $72,000 |
| ARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE | $60,886 |
| 4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC | $58,333 |
| 111 PROJECT INC | $54,750 |
| COMMISSION 127 | $45,833 |
| BENNETT CHAPEL FAMILY OUTREACH CENTER | $41,000 |
| FLORIDA 127 INCORPORATED | $37,503 |
| CATALYTIC CONSULTING NYC LLC | $35,000 |
| JUSTICE FOR ORPHANS | $33,246 |
| EVERY DAY JESUS | $31,723 |
| COMPACT FAMILY SERVICES | $28,752 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $4.4M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, $4.3M to organizations and $168k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: ORPHAN PREVENTION
Stated purpose: ORPHAN CARE / PREVENTION · JOB CREATION / ORPHAN PREVENTION
Stated purpose: ORPHAN CARE
Stated purpose: ORPHAN CARE / PREVENTION · ORPHAN CARE/PREVENTION
Stated purpose: ORPHAN CARE / PREVENTION
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $311k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHARVEST FAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES7× · 2018–2024 · $677k · revenue +75% · 34% of their budget
- PHPATRICK HENRY FAMILY SERVICES OPERATIONS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $461k · revenue +192%
- BRBEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION7× · 2017–2024 · $459k · revenue +331%
Funded once
- GMGLOBAL MOBILIZATION MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $104k · revenue +25%
- PIPOTHAWIRA INTERNATIONALgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $58k · revenue +510%
- FFFOSTERING FAMILYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +166%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…
To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.
Biblical family counseling
Provide resources for global orphan care
Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…
Meeting with special needs families, provide training to teachers in order to advise and consult special needs families, conduct meetings to discuss organizational needs and training to expand ministry and reach. Provide content and…
Childrens Home and Ministry in India
Church ministry
Church
Our mission is to equip families to live their best lives daily, with values and principles consistent with a healthy lifestyle, that will enable a family to live productive lives in the community.
To inform the public the need for bridge family homes and identify families interested in adopting or fostering children of all races with special emphasis on African American children in state custody.
Support for foster children and parents
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Community Center Cdc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARVEST FAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds The New York City Leadership Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PATRICK HENRY FAMILY SERVICES OPERATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION ↗
- Who funds Promise686 Inc ↗
- Who funds 111Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Horizons International ↗
- Who funds Bennett Chapel Family Outreach Center Inc ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM COMMUNITY CENTER CDC ↗
- Who funds ICARE VILLAGE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A WHITSONLIFE INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF THE BRIDE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL MOBILIZATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING FAMILY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds 111 TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds POTHAWIRA INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MBCH CHILDREN AND FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HANDS OF HOPE ADOPTION & ORPHAN CARE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING FAMILY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION 127 INC ↗
- Who funds PastorServe Inc ↗
- Who funds SCORE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds 111 PROJECT OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA 1 27 INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds RADICAL LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds REACHING HIGHER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Promise686 Inc · Stand Together Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Global Orphan Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.