· Private foundation
The Myron Stratton Home
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $398k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $315k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Catholic Charities | $100,000 |
| Fostering Hope Foundation | $100,000 |
| Atlas Prep School | $65,000 |
| Elevation Community Land Trust | $50,000 |
| Community Partnership Family Resources | $30,000 |
| Hilltop Ranch | $30,000 |
| Family Promise | $25,000 |
| Mercy's Gate | $25,000 |
| Peak Education | $20,000 |
| Family Life Services | $20,000 |
| Raise the Future | $20,000 |
| Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation | $20,000 |
| Disability ServicesEnvida (3 Yrs Grant) | $20,000 |
| Beautiful Redemption | $20,000 |
| Junior Achievement of Southern Colorado | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC4× · 2019–2023 · $285k · revenue +110%- HAHOPE AND HOME2× · 2019–2020 · $275k · revenue +6%
- FHFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $203k · revenue +218%
Funded once
- CCCripple CreekVictor School Districtone grant, 2022 · $100k
- WFWe Fortifygraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +111%
- FTFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE)one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
CHF assists working families in their quest to go from homelessness to self-sufficiency for life.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.
To promote the full inclusion and integration of people with all types of disabilities into all levels of society.
SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.
To provide compassionate, comprehensive, and accessible healthcare for individuals of all ages, fostering a healthier and brighter future for every child and adult in our community. Our vision is rooted in a commitment to providing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope and Home and the most unlike its peers is Rudy Balke Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND HOME ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds Atlas Preparatory School Inc ↗
- Who funds Mercy's Gate ↗
- Who funds Partners in Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds The Christian Home For Children Inc ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE CARES INC ↗
- Who funds Community of Caring Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA of the Pikes Peak Region ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds TESSA ↗
- Who funds Special Kids-Special Families Inc ↗
- Who funds ELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Peak Education ↗
- Who funds Homeward Pikes Peak ↗
- Who funds We Fortify ↗
- Who funds FOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE) ↗
- Who funds Hillside Connection ↗
- Who funds BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION ↗
- Who funds TRI-LAKES CARES ↗
- Who funds Cheyenne Village ↗
- Who funds Home Front Military Network ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds Children's Literacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Teller Senior Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds The Place ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds FRESH START CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak United Way · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Ent Credit Union · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Marson Foundation · T Rowe Price Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Myron Stratton Home funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Myron Stratton Home?
Find your warmest path to The Myron Stratton Home through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.