· Public charity
Colorado Springs Health Foundation
To provide grants that target immediate healthcare needs and encourage healthy living.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $904k
- $50k–250k43 grants · $4.5M
- $250k+3 grants · $845k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Peak Vista Community Health Centers | $300,000 |
| We Fortify | $290,000 |
| Greccio Housing | $255,000 |
| Brothers Redevelopment Inc | $200,000 |
| Care and Share Food Bank for Southern Colorado | $200,000 |
| Step Denver | $200,000 |
| Food to Power | $200,000 |
| The Place | $150,000 |
| Pikes Peak Hospice and Palliative Care Inc | $150,000 |
| Academy School District 20 | $150,000 |
| Colorado Association of Family and Childrens Agenc | $150,000 |
| Pikes Peak Habitat for Humanity | $150,000 |
| Benefits in Action | $139,250 |
| Greccio Housing | $133,728 |
| Solid Rock Community Development Corporation | $131,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
115 repeat relationships — 68 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $944k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND4× · 2017–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +109%- PVPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS4× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +18%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2020 · $1.2M · revenue +40%
Funded once
- CTCROSSROADS' TURNING POINTS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +171%
- ECELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +26%
- CHCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $225k · revenue -27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…
To empower Coloradans affected by mental health conditions and providing them with skills and tools necessary to achieve their personal wellness goal.
The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Recovery from addiction is a process of gaining sobriety and contributing to one's family and community as a healthy productive person. AFRC provides peer coach mentoring to individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
Step Springs is a subsidiary organization of Step Denver and when it opens in 2025 will be the first replication of the Step program. Step is a residential recovery community that gives men with nowhere else to turn the opportunity to…
Cbhc's mission is to support community resilience, guide behavioral health innovation, and enhance individual well-being throughout colorado by supporting colorado's community behavioral health safety net providers.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joint Initiatives for Youth and Families and the most unlike its peers is Ballet Folklorico De Barajas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP (CHP) ↗
- Who funds FOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE) ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SERENITY RECOVERY CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOINT INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC ↗
- Who funds Homeward Pikes Peak ↗
- Who funds GRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds SOLID ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ASCENDING TO HEALTH RESPITE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds We Fortify ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Community of Caring Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TESSA ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Atlas Preparatory School Inc ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds Community Partnership for Child Development ↗
- Who funds SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds The Place ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
- Who funds Community Coalition for Families and Children ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Marson Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · The Denver Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Colorado Springs Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.