Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS

PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS (Texas) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $241,422 to it, the largest being LADIES OF CHARITY LAKE TRAVIS INC ($103,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$587k
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$241k
Net assets
$191k
4/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Partners in Hope - Texas does

Mission

Our mission is to empower communities to work together to eliminate social isolation and the hopelessness it causes. We connect neighbors in need with ongoing community support through unique partnerships with local churches, other nonprofits, and servant-hearted volunteers.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Direct client support: using a relational ministry approach, we make connections with isolated and often-hopeless neighbors in need. Walking with them for at least one year, we build relationships with the goal of moving them into community, thus reducing the negative effects of social isolation. Relationship-building is the primary goal of our collaborative efforts, and we provide multiple opportunities for connection every month such as: regular home visits and phone calls; community workdays (home-repair projects and yard maintenance); meal deliveries; monthly fellowship gatherings; and special holiday events and deliveries. We also try to connect clients with specific services that might be of value to them such as counseling, job resources, financial assistance, technology, and healthcare.

    $216,385 spentof which $27,498 as grants
    50% of program spending
  2. Volunteer training and engagement: partners in hope has a specialized training program to help volunteers understand how to best walk with our socially isolated neighbors. We also have training events that volunteers can participate in to further their skills of relational ministry. Working together, our network of compassionate christian servants is committed to connecting these isolated neighbors with the targeted resources they need, helping them plug in to their communities, and paving the way for them to become part of a local church family. This unusual partnership approach has been extremely effective at reducing the devastating effects of social isolation and transforming lives in a powerful way. Staff encourage volunteers and track volunteer engagement with measurable participation data.

    $118,687 spent
    27% of program spending
  3. Living condition assistance: our entry point to working with isolated neighbors is often by first addressing urgent living condition needs. This includes minor repairs, clean up, yard work, maintenance, and replacing broken items. Our community workdays, open to individuals and families of all ages, are a great way for volunteers to get to know these neighbors. We also facilitate private serving events for companies and small groups and match volunteers who can help with a specific need to individuals. Living condition assistance might also include non-home items such as car repair or durable medical equipment.

    $101,452 spentof which $35,339 as grants
    23% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $436,524.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($343k) Expenses 100 ($263k) Net assets 100 ($175k)2021 Revenue 154 ($529k) Expenses 117 ($308k) Net assets 226 ($395k)2022 Revenue 155 ($531k) Expenses 177 ($465k) Net assets 264 ($461k)2023 Revenue 136 ($466k) Expenses 214 ($564k) Net assets 208 ($363k)2024 Revenue 139 ($478k) Expenses 231 ($608k) Net assets 134 ($233k)2025 Revenue 171 ($587k) Expenses 239 ($629k) Net assets 109 ($191k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (171)Expenses (239)Net assets (109)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $182k to $401k (+120%).

$182k
$401k
$473k
$365k
$236k
$213k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$80k
’20
$220k
’21
$66k
’22
−$98k
’23
−$129k
’24
−$42k
’25
4.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Matt Peacock

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020212022202320242025
Listed141112161314
Joined·+0+3+4+2+3
No longer listed·32052
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $2k → $27k.

5 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 55% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS.

43%
largest funder
89%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 52% · 2022 39% · 2023 62% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

75% of PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

55% of PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $109k that is directly attributable, 99% of it comes from Texas funders.

NJ
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $133k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS has grown faster than half of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−7% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)11% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 17%Fundraising 14%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

49%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS?
PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS (Texas) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $241,422 to it, the largest being LADIES OF CHARITY LAKE TRAVIS INC ($103,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $241,422 in grants to PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS?
LADIES OF CHARITY LAKE TRAVIS INC is the largest funder on record, with $103,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PARTNERS IN HOPE - TEXAS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Partners in Hope - Texas →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing