Skip to content
Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX

Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas ("WHFPT") is dedicated to the belief that all Texans deserve the right to determine the number, timing, and spacing of their children through access to affordable, confidential, high-quality family planning services.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$114MPublic Benefit$554kHuman Services$303kHousing & Shelter$19kCivil Rights$6k
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+15 grants · $10M
$220,089
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dallas County Hospital District dba Parkland Health & Hospital System$1,698,731
South Texas Family Planning and Health Corporation$1,464,680
Access Esperanza Clinics Inc$1,366,252
Women's and Men's Health Services CCB$1,025,858
City of Houston$771,634
Legacy Community Health Services Inc$624,886
Longview Wellness Center Inc$575,541
University Health System dba Bexar County Hospital District$455,790
Haven Health Clinics$348,350
Collins Family Planning Clinic Inc$343,085
Bell County Public Health District$341,513
Project Vida Health Center$296,435
Tyler Family Circle of Care$292,814
Houston Area Community Services$274,509
CommUnityCare$264,407
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Community Action of C TX: $260k → 10%Community Action of C TX: $222k → 10%Community Action Inc of Central Texas: $198k → 10%Community Action of Central TX: $196k → 10%Community Action of C TX: $181k → 10%Black Mamas Community Collective: $19k → 10%Community Action of Central TX: $174k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $172k → 10%Community Action of Central TX: $139k → 10%Community Action of C TX: $136k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115M · 43 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
11

Total granted

$115M
$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+32%

Still filing today

58%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +152%
  • AE
    ACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +68%
  • WA
    WOMEN'S AND MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF THE COASTAL BEND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TC
    Travis Cnty Correctional Comp
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • BW
    Brookside Women's Medical Center
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • NC
    North Central Texas Community Health Care Centergraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
2
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
3
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
4
Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body Tx

Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas ("WHFPT") is dedicated to the belief that all Texans deserve the right to determine the number, timing, and spacing of their children through access to affordable, confidential,…

Health
5
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
6
Fredericksburg Community Health Center

The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.

Health
7
Planned Parenthood South Texas

The purpose of Planned Parenthood South Texas ("the Organization") is to provide family planning and sexual healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved…

Health
8
Spring Branch Community Health Center

To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.

Health
9
Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.

Health
10
Planned Parenthood Cameron County

Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved populations.

Health
11
North Texas Area Community Health Center

Provide a community medical home through accessible, compassionate, and quality healthcare services in a community-based environment, maximizing the use of public and private resources to aid ntachc patients to obtain, regain, and maintain…

Health
12
University of North Texas Health Science Center At Ft Worth Health Systems

To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Health Resources for Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Central Texas Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
27/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION: $12,775,748 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATIONACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC: $12,503,934 · HealthACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INCWOMEN'S AND MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF THE COASTAL BEND INC: $5,669,855 · HealthWOMEN'S AND MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF THE COASTAL BEND INCLONGVIEW WELLNESS CENTER INC DBA WELLNESS POINTE: $4,530,855 · HealthLONGVIEW WELLNESS CENTER INC DBA WELLNESS POINTELEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $4,402,937 · HealthLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCPlanned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health: $4,335,812 · HealthPlanned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative…HAVEN HEALTH CLINICS: $3,612,577 · HealthCOLLINS' FAMILY PLANNING CLINIC: $3,352,846 · HealthPROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER: $2,618,855 · Health+12 more: $15,296,925 · Health+12 moreDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $15,469,564 · OtherDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTCITY OF HOUSTON: $6,086,546 · OtherCITY OF HOUSTONBELL COUNTY TX: $3,285,097 · OtherBELL COUNTY TXBEXAR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $3,047,011 · OtherBEXAR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM: $1,698,922 · OtherCAMERON COUNTY: $1,458,818 · OtherTexarkana-Bowie County FHC: $1,434,774 · Other+21 more: $10,422,318 · Other+21 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $1,676,752 · Human Services+1 more: $18,750 · Human ServicesMIDWAY FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INC: $1,220,311 · EducationFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $18,750 · Housing & ShelterJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $5,800 · Civil Rights
Health$69,100,344Other$42,903,050Human Services$1,695,502Education$1,220,311Housing & Shelter$18,750Civil Rights$5,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION: $12,775,748 over 9y, 23% of budgetACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC: $12,503,934 over 9y, 19% of budgetWOMEN'S AND MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF THE COASTAL BEND INC: $5,669,855 over 6y, 17% of budgetLONGVIEW WELLNESS CENTER INC DBA WELLNESS POINTE: $4,530,855 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $4,402,937 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health: $4,335,812 over 3y, 17% of budgetHAVEN HEALTH CLINICS: $3,612,577 over 9y, 31% of budgetCOLLINS' FAMILY PLANNING CLINIC: $3,352,846 over 9y, 28% of budgetPROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER: $2,618,855 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2,208,330 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetTYLER FAMILY CIRCLE OF CARE: $2,134,880 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetPlanned Parenthood San Antonio: $2,069,445 over 3y, 36% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $1,676,752 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetHEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $1,672,917 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $1,358,715 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC: $1,312,219 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWOMEN'S HEALTHCARE CENTER: $1,287,731 over 7y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $1,222,535 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMIDWAY FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INC: $1,220,311 over 9y, 69% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $1,173,481 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE: $957,697 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEl Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission: $797,667 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetYOUR HEALTH CLINIC: $750,284 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetVALLEY AIDS COUNCIL: $666,424 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL TEXAS MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $514,370 over 3y, 28% of budgetNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Center: $30,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlack Mamas Community Collective: $18,750 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $18,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $5,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS ALLIANCE TO REDUCE UNINTENDED PREGNANCY IN TEENS: $5,225 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S AND MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF THE COASTAL BEND INC ↗
  • Who funds LONGVIEW WELLNESS CENTER INC DBA WELLNESS POINTE ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN HEALTH CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds COLLINS' FAMILY PLANNING CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TYLER FAMILY CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood San Antonio ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWAY FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
  • Who funds El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission ↗
  • Who funds YOUR HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY AIDS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Episcopal Health Foun…Direct ReliefAmericares Foundation…St David's FoundationAmerican Cancer Socie…The Moody FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…United Way for Greate…Methodist Healthcare …Communities Foundatio…Upstream USA IncReach Out and Read Inc
Episcopal Health FoundationTX30× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Episcopal Health Foundation · Direct Relief · Americares Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · The Moody Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Upstream USA Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home