Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Upstream USA Inc

Upstreams mission is to ensure that patient-centered contraceptive care is basic healthcare.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
77
Grants FY2024still arriving
24
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$9.1MHuman Services$25k
02FY2024 · 77 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k61 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $854k
  • $250k+1 grant · $800k
$23,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$242M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Womens Health and Family Planning Association of Texas$800,000
AllianceChicago - Illinois Contraceptive Access Now$203,500
Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc$150,000
Washington Association for Community Health$100,188
504HealthNet Inc$100,000
Unity Healthcare Inc$75,000
Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund$75,000
Community Health Center of Cape Cod$50,000
Codman Square Health Center Inc$50,000
Charles River Community Health Inc$50,000
NorthShore Health Centers Inc$41,000
The Regents of the University of California dba UCSF$40,000
Jane Pauley Community Health Center Inc$37,500
Clinica Colorado$37,500
Ibn Sina Foundation Inc$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $174k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LCH Health and Community Services: $28k → 6%Colorado Coalition for the Homeless: $30k → 12%Pace Community Action Agency Inc: $25k → 15%Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc: $6k → 16%LCH Health and Community Services: $18k → 6%Colorado Coalition for the Homeless: $25k → 12%Tri-County Community Action Agency: $9k → 14%Tri-County Community Action Agency: $9k → 14%Comprehensive Community Action Inc: $19k → 14%Comprehensive Community Action Inc: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
KS
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.9M · 75 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

75 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
42

Total granted

$6.9M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+28%

Still filing today

80%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $900k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $793k · revenue +65%
  • MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $450k · revenue +33%
  • A
    ALLIANCECHICAGO
    2× · 2023–2024 · $407k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CI
    CONVERGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $275k · revenue +175%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +31%
  • CH
    CARING HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
2
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
3
Community Clinic of Maui Inc

To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.

Health
4
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
5
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
6
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
7
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
8
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
9
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
10
Central Texas Community Health Centers

Communitycare operates 25 health center locations offering comprehensive primary care services for the entire family including pediatrics, behavioral health services, and dental care.

Health
11
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
12
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dothouse Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Wash. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Developmental Disabilities …Addiction Recovery ServicesPregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%40%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%47%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/150
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,415

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
111/112
Grantees still filing
85/112
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX — $1,478,387 · HealthWomen's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TXPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC — $793,423 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INCALLIANCECHICAGO — $407,000 · HealthALLIANCECHICAGOCONVERGE INC — $275,000 · Health+79 more — $3,555,935 · Health+79 moreMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $450,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COM…WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH — $170,624 · OtherWASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR …WHIDBEY HEALTH HOSPITAL — $97,276 · OtherDE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNOCOLOGY PA — $85,080 · OtherWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC — $82,407 · OtherALL ABOUT WOMEN — $75,679 · Other+50 more — $1,237,049 · Other+50 moreColorado Coalition for the Homeless — $55,000 · Human ServicesLCH Health and Community Services — $46,000 · Human ServicesSTART Corporation — $28,000 · Human ServicesPACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $17,250 · Human Services+1 more — $6,000 · Human ServicesCARING FOR COLORADO CENTENNIAL FUND — $75,000 · PhilanthropyThe Wright Center Medical Group — $48,000 · ReligionALLIANCE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMIDWAY FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Education
Health$6,509,745Other$2,198,115Human Services$202,250Philanthropy$75,000Religion$48,000Youth Development$25,000Education$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWomen's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX — $1,478,387 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC — $793,423 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $450,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCECHICAGO — $407,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCONVERGE INC — $275,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC — $205,363 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH — $170,624 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLA RED HEALTH CENTER INC — $163,254 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $125,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTIDALHEALTH NANTICOKE INC — $116,658 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH END COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget504HEALTHNET INC — $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCREEK VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC — $97,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $92,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC — $82,407 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCARING HEALTH CENTER INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Boston Community Health Center In — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLES RIVER COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCODMAN SQUARE HEALTH CENTER INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF CAPE COD INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITY HEALTH CARE INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FOR COLORADO CENTENNIAL FUND — $75,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION — $73,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $72,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $71,742 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND NORTH IDAHO — $67,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER INC — $56,132 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthshore Health Centers Inc — $56,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Coalition for the Homeless — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATTAPAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetODYSSEY HOUSE LOUISIANA INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHFIRST NETWORK INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLONE STAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTERS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOTHOUSE HEALTH INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION — $49,771 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Wright Center Medical Group — $48,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLINICA COLORADO — $47,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetLCH Health and Community Services — $46,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKINSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $45,075 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMT BAKER PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $42,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC — $38,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $37,970 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefReach Out and Read IncAmerican Cancer Socie…Massdevelopment Hefa …Massachusetts League …Americares Foundation…Delta Dental of Washi…Boston Medical Center…President and Fellows…Eastern Bank Foundati…Health Resources in A…The Duke Endowment
Direct ReliefCA86.2× affinity69 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Massdevelopment Hefa Trust · Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Washington · Boston Medical Center Corporation · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Eastern Bank Foundation · Health Resources in Action Inc · The Duke Endowment

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Upstream USA Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • La Red Health Center Inc — 51% of income from government
  • Westside Family Healthcare Inc — 48% of income from government
  • North Shore Community Health Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Caring Health Center Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Family Health Center of Worcesterinc — 39% of income from government
  • Harbor Health Services Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Holyoke Health Center Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Lowell Community Health Center Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Alliance Community Health Center Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Manet Community Health Center Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Stanley Street Treatment and Resources Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Healthfirst Family Care Center Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Community Health Center of Franklin County Incorporated — 21% of income from government
  • Mattapan Community Health Center Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Charles River Community Health Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Generations Family Health Center — 20% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Delaware Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Hilltown Community Health Centers Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Outer Cape Health Services Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Community Clinic Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Greater New Bedford Community Health Center Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Community Health Programs Incorporated — 13% of income from government
  • North End Community Health Committee — 13% of income from government
  • Dothouse Health Inc — 11% of income from government
  • South Boston Community Health Center in — 10% of income from government
  • Community Health Center of Cape Cod Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Codman Square Health Center Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Baystate Medical Practices Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Tidalhealth Nanticoke Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Bayhealth Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home