How much did Episcopal Health Foundation grant in FY2024?

Episcopal Health Foundation reported 155 grants totaling $37,949,042 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is Episcopal Health Foundation based?

Episcopal Health Foundation is based in TX.

Episcopal Health Foundation

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

Episcopal Health Foundation

To advance the Kingdom of God with specific focus on human health and well-being, through grants, research and initiatives in support of the mission of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas.

$38M

Granted FY2024

155

Grants

Communities

$1.0M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of Episcopal Health Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

coverage benefitbldg brainchge hlthhlth finbrain devt-commbrain devt-provcomphrensive clinics

2019

brain orgsbrain providersconductsissuesimprovingnamcommunity-based

2020

covid businessbusiness continuitybrain dev-communitydev-community orgschg healthcarebrain development-providerlsfhc

2021

bastropbrain development-communityissuesbuildexpandingconnectingdonors

2022

earlylsfhcuninsuredmontgomeryaffordable healthcarenewsbrain development-providers

2023

taylorphase kickkick offaddressing gapsbrain development-communitypolicieschildren youth

2024

development-community orgsvibrantmaternaldoulapostpartumhungerfood bank

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 155 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k16 grants · $160k
$50k–250k75 grants · $11M
$250k+64 grants · $26M

$200,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.2B

Total assets

Largest grants

Lone Star Circle of Care$1,000,000
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas$915,000
Spindletop Center (MHMR)$750,000
Texans Care for Children$650,000
ECHOS-Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services$600,000
Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast$600,000
Vecino Health Centers$600,000
The Network Of Behavioral Health Providers$500,000
Waco Family Medicine$500,000
Episcopal Diocese of Texas$500,000
Sustainable Food Center Inc$500,000
Giving Austin Labor Support (GALS)$500,000
Children's Defense Fund$500,000
Santa Maria Hostel Inc$500,000
North Pasadena Community Outreach$469,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $31.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$267M · 168 repeat orgs$274M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

168 repeat relationships — 107 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

168

Total granted

$267M

$270M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%

+21%

Still filing today

85%

73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LS
Lone Star Circle of Care
8× · 2017–2024 · $7.7M · revenue +32%
PC
Peoples Community Clinic
8× · 2017–2024 · $6.6M · revenue +82%
WF
Waco Family Medicine
7× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +36%

Funded once

BQ
Bishop Quin Foundation
one grant, 2022 · $260M
UO
University of Houston COM
one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
AF
Alliance for Strong Familiesgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $727k · revenue +66%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health.

Health

Texas Health Physicians Group

A FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATION WHOSE MISSION IS TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF the people in the communities it serves, regarless of thier ability to pay.

Health

Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health

Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health

Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, THR operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve healthcare.

Health

North Central Texas Community Health Care

To provide access to quality affordable primary and preventative healthcare services in a safe environment to the underserved residents of north central texas. see schedule o.

Health

East Texas Community Clinic Inc

Provides access to high quality primary care to any resident in east texas.

—

Texas Healthcare Trustees

Tht provides research and recognizes health care trustees and organizations that excel in governance, education, and service.

Health

Christus Health Southeast Texas

Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the teachings of the catholic church.

Health

Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on ability to pay.

Health

Your Health Clinic

Empowering north texans to optimize health through outreach, education, prevention, evidence-based interventions, integration, and quality measurement.

—

The McCombs School of Business

To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Rose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.8%2/251

the rest of the field

14%

9,352/68,288

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

212 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

204/212

Grantees still filing

162/212

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$374,652,970Health$91,786,618Human Services$34,350,660Philanthropy$15,566,174Education$8,547,107Civil Rights$8,001,581Community Improvement$7,377,380

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St David's FoundationTX100.8× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St David's Foundation · United Way of Greater Houston · Houston Endowment Inc · The Methodist Hospital · Austin Community Foundation Inc · United Way for Greater Austin · Cullen Trust For Health Care · Rockwell Fund Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · The Moody Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Episcopal Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Bayside Healthcare Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 205853573 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Bayside Healthcare Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Episcopal Health Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Episcopal Health Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Episcopal Health Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

212 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Episcopal Health Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Episcopal Health Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

212 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Episcopal Health Foundation?

More from the funding graph