Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Episcopal Health Foundation

To advance the Kingdom of God with specific focus on human health and well-being, through grants, research and initiatives in support of the mission of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas.

$38M
Granted FY2024still arriving
158
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$397MPhilanthropy$70MHuman Services$18MCommunity Improvement$10MEducation$7.9MHousing & Shelter$7.1MCivil Rights$7.0MReligion$6.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 158 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k76 grants · $12M
  • $250k+66 grants · $26M
$200,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lone Star Circle of Care$1,000,000
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas$915,000
Spindletop Center (MHMR)$750,000
Texans Care for Children$650,000
Vecino Health Centers$600,000
ECHOS-Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services$600,000
Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast$600,000
Sustainable Food Center Inc$500,000
Waco Family Medicine$500,000
Episcopal Diocese of Texas$500,000
Giving Austin Labor Support (GALS)$500,000
Children's Defense Fund$500,000
The Network Of Behavioral Health Providers$500,000
Santa Maria Hostel Inc$500,000
North Pasadena Community Outreach$469,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $32.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Episcopal Relief & Development: $600k → 17%Bastrop County Cares: $400k → 12%Family Service Center Of Galveston County Texas: $477k → 14%Burke Center MHMR: $750k → 16%Neighborhood Recovery CDC: $717k → 16%Samaritan Counseling Center Of Southeast Texas: $250k → 19%Brazos Valley Comm Action Agc: $552k → 22%Alliance for Strong Families: $727k → 17%Episcopal Relief & Development: $400k → 17%Bastrop County Cares: $400k → 12%Family Service Ctr Galveston: $333k → 14%Brazos Valley Community Action Agency: $500k → 22%St Paul Children's Foundation: $350k → 12%Bastrop County Cares: $300k → 12%Brazos Valley Comm Action Agc: $290k → 22%Neighborhood Recovery CDC: $325k → 16%Neighborhood Recovery CDC: $320k → 16%Neighborhood Recovery CDC: $255k → 16%Neighborhood Recovery CDC: $250k → 16%Boat People SOS: $280k → 16%Boat People SOS Inc: $280k → 16%Boat People SOS Inc: $260k → 16%Central Texas Interfaith: $630k → 10%Austin Interfaith Sponsoring Comm: $600k → 10%Central Texas Interfaith: $550k → 10%Alliance of Comm A Ministries: $305k → 16%Austin Interfaith Sponsoring Committee: $300k → 10%BakerRipley: $400k → 16%ECHOS-Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services: $600k → 16%The Women's Home: $350k → 16%Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services (ECHOS): $600k → 16%Epiphany Comm Health Outreach Svc: $350k → 16%Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services-(ECHOS): $310k → 16%Epiphany Community Health Outreach: $255k → 16%Healthcare for the Homeless - Houston: $500k → 16%Healthcare for the Homeless - Houston: $360k → 16%Bread of Life Inc: $280k → 16%Center for Urban Transformation: $300k → 16%MAM (Memorial Assistance Ministries): $360k → 16%MAM (Memorial Assistance Ministries): $360k → 16%Memorial Assistance Ministr: $354k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministries: $500k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministri: $500k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministries: $500k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministries: $300k → 16%The Network Of Behavioral Health Providers Inc: $1.0M → 16%Network of Behavioral Health: $500k → 16%The Network Of Behavioral Health Providers: $500k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
NY
NJ
CT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$265M · 162 repeat orgs$273M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

162 repeat relationships — 105 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

162
64

Total granted

$265M
$270M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+13%

Still filing today

85%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.3M · revenue +29%
  • PC
    PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.6M · revenue +82%
  • HO
    HEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BQ
    BISHOP QUIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $260M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • SC
    SOCIAL CURRENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $727k · revenue +149%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
2
South Central Houston Action Council Inc

The organization provides medical services in the form of primary and preventive care to underserved and underinsured residents of harris county.

—
3
Your Health Clinic

Empowering north texans to optimize health through outreach, education, prevention, evidence-based interventions, integration, and quality measurement.

—
4
Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.

Health
5
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
6
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
7
Integrated Care Collaboration

ICC (dba Connxus) is a nonprofit alliance of health care providers in Central Texas dedicated to collecting, analyzing and sharing health information to improve healthcare quality and cost efficiency across the continuum of care.

Health
8
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
9
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement
10
Community Information Now

Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.

Community Improvement
11
TexHealth Central Texas

Provide a 3 share plan that offers low-cost premium assistance to pay part of the monthly health benefit cost for low income employees. The cost of the program is split between the employer, employee, and TexHealth.

Health
12
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lone Star Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Fannie E Rippel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%6%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr12%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr11%61%35–55yr12%14%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%3/252
the rest of the field
15%
13,083/87,934

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

213 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 213 of the 253 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

50
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
52
Early backer (in before they grew)
205/213
Grantees still filing
144/213
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BISHOP QUIN FOUNDATION — $260,000,000 · OtherBISHOP QUIN FOUNDATIONEDOT FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION — $25,833,333 · OtherEDOT FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION+74 more — $87,128,174 · Other+74 moreLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE — $8,303,917 · HealthLONE STAR CIRCLE OF…PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $6,603,672 · HealthPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY …HEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $5,139,861 · HealthHEART OF TEXAS COMM…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $4,650,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $4,104,800 · HealthFORT BEND FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC — $4,083,750 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital — $3,470,400 · HealthSTEPHEN F AUSTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $3,410,000 · HealthHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $3,400,000 · HealthASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA — $3,216,823 · HealthAUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE — $3,188,544 · HealthCENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $3,077,889 · Health+41 more — $39,342,337 · Health+41 moreEPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES — $2,495,000 · Human ServicesAustin Interfaith Sponsoring Committee Incorporated — $2,338,600 · Human ServicesThe Network of Behavioral Health Providers Inc — $2,303,500 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $2,197,848 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD RECOVERY COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT CORP — $2,044,415 · Human ServicesBakerRipley — $1,947,325 · Human ServicesBASTROP COUNTY CARES — $1,904,915 · Human ServicesMemorial Assistance Ministries — $1,757,119 · Human ServicesFamily Service Center of Galveston County Texas — $1,677,984 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $1,650,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS-HOUSTON — $1,650,000 · Human ServicesBRAZOS VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $1,593,215 · Human ServicesST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $1,171,250 · Human Services+21 more — $9,957,989 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN — $3,789,790 · PhilanthropyHouston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab — $1,983,015 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,790,000 · PhilanthropyRupani Foundation — $1,642,000 · PhilanthropyHEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS — $1,550,000 · PhilanthropyHOUSTON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,419,369 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $660,000 · Philanthropy+10 more — $2,897,000 · PhilanthropyWilliam Marsh Rice University — $3,342,501 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine — $2,780,402 · EducationThe George Washington University — $675,163 · EducationSMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC — $447,500 · EducationThe Texas International Institute of Health Professions — $435,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · Education+2 more — $396,541 · EducationCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $4,242,321 · Civil RightsYOUNG INVINCIBLES — $1,869,960 · Civil RightsMI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $1,039,300 · Civil RightsHouston in Action Network — $750,000 · Civil RightsTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $1,870,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $1,547,700 · Community ImprovementEAST HARRIS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL — $1,375,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER WACO COLLECTIVE IMPACT INITIATIVE — $1,169,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES FOR BETTER HEALTH — $605,680 · Community ImprovementBaby Cakes and Brunch — $385,000 · Community ImprovementEQUIDAD ATX INC — $250,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $165,000 · Community Improvement
Other$372,961,507Health$91,991,993Human Services$34,689,160Philanthropy$15,731,174Education$8,477,107Civil Rights$7,901,581Community Improvement$7,367,380

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE — $8,303,917 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $6,603,672 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetHEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $5,139,861 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $4,650,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $4,242,321 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $4,104,800 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetFORT BEND FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC — $4,083,750 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN — $3,789,790 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $3,470,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN F AUSTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $3,410,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $3,400,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $3,342,501 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA — $3,216,823 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetTHE ROSE — $3,200,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetAUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE — $3,188,544 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $3,077,889 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation — $3,010,500 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetMental Health America of Greater Houston Inc — $3,005,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetLONE STAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $2,845,846 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $2,780,402 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEl Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission — $2,776,334 over 3y, 28% of budgetSPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC — $2,669,703 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetHOUSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $2,619,750 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetTexans Care For Children Inc — $2,590,000 over 5y, 67% of budgetGULF COAST LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC — $2,548,300 over 5y, 100% of budgetEPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES — $2,495,000 over 7y, 35% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $2,340,540 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetAustin Interfaith Sponsoring Committee Incorporated — $2,338,600 over 5y, 92% of budgetThe Network of Behavioral Health Providers Inc — $2,303,500 over 6y, 75% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $2,197,848 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetGo AustinVamos Austin — $2,194,979 over 7y, 72% of budgetMATAGORDA EPISCOPAL HEALTH OUTREACH PROGRAM CORPORATION — $2,045,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD RECOVERY COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT CORP — $2,044,415 over 7y, 12% of budgetHouston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab — $1,983,015 over 4y, 39% of budgetBakerRipley — $1,947,325 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA MARIA HOSTEL INC — $1,935,039 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetBASTROP COUNTY CARES — $1,904,915 over 6y, 55% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $1,870,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetYOUNG INVINCIBLES — $1,869,960 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetEL CENTRO DE CORAZON — $1,825,263 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,790,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $1,770,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMemorial Assistance Ministries — $1,757,119 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $1,721,363 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetFamily Service Center of Galveston County Texas — $1,677,984 over 7y, 17% of budgetNORTH PASADENA COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $1,658,662 over 7y, 63% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $1,650,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS-HOUSTON — $1,650,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORT BEND FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN F AUSTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA ↗
  • Who funds THE ROSE ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Avenue Community Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texans Care For Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds GULF COAST LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds EPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Austin Interfaith Sponsoring Committee Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds The Network of Behavioral Health Providers Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Go AustinVamos Austin ↗
  • Who funds MATAGORDA EPISCOPAL HEALTH OUTREACH PROGRAM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD RECOVERY COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St David's FoundationHouston Endowment IncUnited Way of Greater…The Methodist HospitalMeadows Foundation IncCullen Trust For Heal…The Simmons FoundationThe Moody FoundationRockwell Fund IncUnited Way for Greate…Austin Community Foun…Greater Houston Commu…
St David's FoundationTX101.4× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St David's Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · The Methodist Hospital · Meadows Foundation Inc · Cullen Trust For Health Care · The Simmons Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Rockwell Fund Inc · United Way for Greater Austin · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Episcopal Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Preeclampsia Foundation Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 253 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home