· Public charity
Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX
Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas ("WHFPT") is dedicated to the belief that all Texans deserve the right to determine the number, timing, and spacing of their children through access to affordable, confidential, high-quality family planning services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+15 grants · $10M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Dallas County Hospital District dba Parkland Health & Hospital System | $1,698,731 |
| South Texas Family Planning and Health Corporation | $1,464,680 |
| Access Esperanza Clinics Inc | $1,366,252 |
| Women's and Men's Health Services CCB | $1,025,858 |
| City of Houston | $771,634 |
| Legacy Community Health Services Inc | $624,886 |
| Longview Wellness Center Inc | $575,541 |
| University Health System dba Bexar County Hospital District | $455,790 |
| Haven Health Clinics | $348,350 |
| Collins Family Planning Clinic Inc | $343,085 |
| Bell County Public Health District | $341,513 |
| Project Vida Health Center | $296,435 |
| Tyler Family Circle of Care | $292,814 |
| Houston Area Community Services | $274,509 |
| CommUnityCare | $264,407 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +152%
- AEACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +68%
- WAWOMEN'S AND MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF THE COASTAL BEND INC6× · 2020–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +27%
Funded once
- TCTravis Cnty Correctional Compone grant, 2021 · $50k
- BWBrookside Women's Medical Centerone grant, 2024 · $50k
- NCNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Centergraduatedone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy counseling
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).
Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas ("WHFPT") is dedicated to the belief that all Texans deserve the right to determine the number, timing, and spacing of their children through access to affordable, confidential,…
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.
The purpose of Planned Parenthood South Texas ("the Organization") is to provide family planning and sexual healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved…
To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.
Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.
Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved populations.
Provide a community medical home through accessible, compassionate, and quality healthcare services in a community-based environment, maximizing the use of public and private resources to aid ntachc patients to obtain, regain, and maintain…
To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Health Resources for Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is North Central Texas Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S AND MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF THE COASTAL BEND INC ↗
- Who funds LONGVIEW WELLNESS CENTER INC DBA WELLNESS POINTE ↗
- Who funds LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HEALTH CLINICS ↗
- Who funds COLLINS' FAMILY PLANNING CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TYLER FAMILY CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood San Antonio ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds HEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWAY FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
- Who funds El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission ↗
- Who funds YOUR HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY AIDS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Episcopal Health Foundation · Direct Relief · Americares Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · The Moody Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Upstream USA Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body TX funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.