· Public charity
Priority Health Total Health Foundation
To promote and support healthcare within the detroit market, including:I.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $1,944,725 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,007,225 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $62,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FORGOTTEN HARVEST | $152,500 |
| ROCKET GIVING FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| DETROIT COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECT | $125,000 |
| BRILLIANT DETROIT | $125,000 |
| BASBLUE | $105,000 |
| WSU WOMEN'S HEALTH | $100,000 |
| LIFE REMODELED | $100,000 |
| SAMARITAS | $100,000 |
| HOUSE OF KADENCE | $91,725 |
| GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC | $76,219 |
| ASCENSION ST JOHN HOSPITAL | $75,000 |
| MACC DEVELOPMENT | $75,000 |
| BLACK FAMILY DEVELOPMENT | $75,000 |
| MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT | $67,500 |
| O'HAIR PARK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION | $57,120 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Brightmoor Connection3× · 2021–2023 · $820k · revenue +346% · 87% of their budget
LAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES2× · 2022–2023 · $414k · revenue +46%- SSAMARITAS2× · 2021–2024 · $350k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- M6MICAH 6 COMMUNITYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue ×11
- AHAUTHORITY HEALTHone grant, 2021 · $450k
RUTH ELLIS CENTERone grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…
The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…
To enable african americans and people in need to reach their full human potential
Our mission is to increase awareness of the problems of people who are homeless and the development and carrying out of strategies to create permanent solutions to homelessness in our community.
Dream of Detroit is combining community organizing with strategic housing and land development to build a healthy community and empower a marginalized neighborhood on the Westside of Detroit.
Detroit central city community mental health's mission is to achieve wellness in the community by providing an integrated array of mental health, housing and substance abuse services with diginity and respect.
To improve the health status of the individuals and the communities we serv by providing access to high quality, respectful and efficient health care services. advantage health centers will also be a catalyst for access to health care and…
Providing pathways to success for detroiters in need.
To inspire a community of active engagement, personal responsibility and hope by connecting people to opportunities and resources to transform the quality of life for all Detroiters.
We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.
Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Brightmoor Connection ↗
- Who funds MICAH 6 COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds BASBLUE INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKET GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds LAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAS ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY KIDZ R US ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds METRO SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND ↗
- Who funds DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds HURLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MACK ALIVE ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds CARING ATHLETES TEAM FOR CHILDREN'S AND HENRY FORD HOSPITALS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WELLNESS PLAN MEDICAL CENTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds HANNAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds MATRIX HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds DETROIT HORSE POWER ↗
- Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds THE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Comerica Charitable Foundation · The Carls Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The Jewish Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Priority Health Total Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.