Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED (Michigan) is funded by 10 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,793,525 in grants to it, the largest being ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ($915,800). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED is funded by 10 grantmakers reporting $1.8M in grants to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 520 housing & shelter nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2025 46%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
55% of U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$272k from 2 funders in 2024, up from $313k and 4 in 2017.
1 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 9 of 10 funders by total. Association, not causation.
U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 81% · 2019 49% · 2020 86% · 2021 85% · 2022 77% · 2023 66% · 2024 71% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
40% of U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 40% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED draws 78% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 10 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
83% of spending goes to programs.
93%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 10funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing