Skip to content
Priority Health Total Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Priority Health Total Health Foundation

To promote and support healthcare within the detroit market, including:I.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$5.4MHuman Services$2.5MFood & Nutrition$1.8MHousing & Shelter$1.1MCommunity Improvement$1.0MYouth Development$860kRecreation & Sports$575kEducation$496kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $1,944,725, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,007,225 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $62,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $1.9M
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$152,500
ROCKET GIVING FOUNDATION$150,000
DETROIT COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECT$125,000
BRILLIANT DETROIT$125,000
BASBLUE$105,000
LIFE REMODELED$100,000
SAMARITAS$100,000
WSU WOMEN'S HEALTH$100,000
HOUSE OF KADENCE$91,725
GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$76,219
BLACK FAMILY DEVELOPMENT$75,000
ASCENSION ST JOHN HOSPITAL$75,000
MACC DEVELOPMENT$75,000
MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT$67,500
O'HAIR PARK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$57,120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPE NETWORK: $50k → 11%HAVEN HOMES OF DETROIT: $100k → 13%ROCKET GIVING FUND: $150k → 21%ROCKET GIVING FUND: $150k → 21%ROCKET GIVING FOUNDATION: $150k → 21%HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICING: $50k → 8%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $50k → 21%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $212k → 8%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $50k → 21%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN FDN: $200k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN FDN: $100k → 8%SAMARITAS: $250k → 21%SAMARITAS: $100k → 21%BASBLUE: $375k → 21%BASBLUE: $105k → 21%BECAUSE OF HIS LOVE OUTREACH: $80k → 21%LIFE LEADERS INC: $60k → 21%HANNAN CENTER: $100k → 21%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $50k → 21%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $104k → 21%HANNAN CENTER: $50k → 21%FREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT: $100k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 18 repeat orgs$8.8M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
58

Total granted

$6.0M
$7.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+20%

Still filing today

89%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Brightmoor Connection
    3× · 2021–2023 · $820k · revenue +346% · 87% of their budget
  • LAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $414k · revenue +46%
  • S
    SAMARITAS
    2× · 2021–2024 · $350k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • M6
    MICAH 6 COMMUNITYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue ×11
  • AH
    AUTHORITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $450k
  • RUTH ELLIS CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
2
About Face Detroit
—
3
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Urban League of Detroit and Southeastern Michigan

To enable african americans and people in need to reach their full human potential

—
5
Homeless Action Network of Detroit

Our mission is to increase awareness of the problems of people who are homeless and the development and carrying out of strategies to create permanent solutions to homelessness in our community.

Human Services
6
Dream of Detroit

Dream of Detroit is combining community organizing with strategic housing and land development to build a healthy community and empower a marginalized neighborhood on the Westside of Detroit.

Human Services
7
Detroit Central City Cmh Inc

Detroit central city community mental health's mission is to achieve wellness in the community by providing an integrated array of mental health, housing and substance abuse services with diginity and respect.

Health
8
Detroit Healthcare for the Homeless

To improve the health status of the individuals and the communities we serv by providing access to high quality, respectful and efficient health care services. advantage health centers will also be a catalyst for access to health care and…

—
9
Say Detroit

Providing pathways to success for detroiters in need.

Housing & Shelter
10
Arise Detroit

To inspire a community of active engagement, personal responsibility and hope by connecting people to opportunities and resources to transform the quality of life for all Detroiters.

Community Improvement
11
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan; the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
76/77
Grantees still filing
40/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $819,989 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYAUTHORITY HEALTH: $450,000 · OtherAUTHORITY HEALTHCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $350,000 · OtherCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $300,000 · OtherVISTA MARIA: $285,000 · OtherTHE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND: $250,000 · OtherPROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN ORDER INC: $208,988 · OtherFRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INC: $200,000 · OtherLAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES: $413,570 · OtherLAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNI…DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION: $250,000 · OtherHURLEY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Other+31 more: $2,151,435 · Other+31 moreBASBLUE INC: $480,000 · Human ServicesBASBLUE INCROCKET GIVING FUND: $450,000 · Human ServicesROCKET GIVING FUNDSAMARITAS: $350,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITASPresbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation: $300,000 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Village…CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $212,333 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE MICHIGANHANNAN CENTER: $150,000 · Human ServicesHANNAN CENTERTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $104,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT: $100,000 · Human ServicesHAVEN HOMES OF DETROIT: $100,000 · Human Services+8 more: $471,000 · Human Services+8 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION: $290,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH ST…BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $279,640 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUN…METRO SOLUTIONS INC: $264,000 · HealthMETRO SOLUTIONS INCKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $225,000 · HealthKIDS KICKING CANCER …MACK ALIVE: $200,000 · HealthMACK ALIVECARING ATHLETES TEAM FOR CHILDREN'S AND HENRY FORD HOSPITALS: $200,000 · HealthCARING ATHLETES TEAM…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $165,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL …WELLNESS PLAN MEDICAL CENTERS FOUNDATION: $156,270 · HealthWELLNESS PLAN MEDICA…DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $150,699 · HealthDEVELOPMENT CENTERS …VISION TO LEARN: $150,000 · HealthVISION TO LEARNTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $150,000 · HealthTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATI…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $145,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC+5 more: $251,219 · Health+5 moreBrightmoor Connection: $820,000 · Food & NutritionBrightmoor…FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $402,500 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN …OAKLAND HOPE: $120,000 · Food & NutritionOAKLAND HO…SAFE HAVEN A HOME AWAY FROM HOME: $91,725 · Food & NutritionSAFE HAVEN…MICAH 6 COMMUNITY: $500,000 · Community ImprovementMICHIGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE VILLAGE REVITALIZATION: $100,003 · Community ImprovementMACK AVENUE COMMUNITY CHURCH COMM DEVE CORP: $75,000 · Community ImprovementHEALTHY KIDZ R US ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $325,000 · Youth DevelopmentDETROIT HORSE POWER: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRILLIANT DETROIT: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentHYPE ATHLETICS COMMUNITY INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentPURE HEART FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $400,000 · Recreation & SportsDETROIT GOLF FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $75,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,878,982Human Services$2,717,333Health$2,626,828Food & Nutrition$1,434,225Community Improvement$925,003Youth Development$700,000Recreation & Sports$575,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBrightmoor Connection: $820,000 over 3y, 87% of budgetBASBLUE INC: $480,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetROCKET GIVING FUND: $450,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLAHC - LEADERS ADVANCING AND HELPING COMMUNITIES: $413,570 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $402,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $400,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $350,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSAMARITAS: $350,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTHY KIDZ R US ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $325,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetPresbyterian Villages of Michigan Foundation: $300,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION: $290,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $285,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $279,640 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMETRO SOLUTIONS INC: $264,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetMICHIGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND: $250,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $225,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $212,333 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetMACK ALIVE: $200,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetHURLEY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INC: $200,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCARING ATHLETES TEAM FOR CHILDREN'S AND HENRY FORD HOSPITALS: $200,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $165,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWELLNESS PLAN MEDICAL CENTERS FOUNDATION: $156,270 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $156,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetDEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $150,699 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHANNAN CENTER: $150,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER: $150,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetREADY FOR SCHOOL: $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMATRIX HUMAN SERVICES: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $150,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $145,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $125,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDETROIT COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION: $125,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOAKLAND HOPE: $120,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $104,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHOPE VILLAGE REVITALIZATION: $100,003 over 1y, 13% of budgetMETRO DETROIT BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE DETROIT: $100,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLIFE REMODELED: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHAVEN HOMES OF DETROIT: $100,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetSAFE HAVEN A HOME AWAY FROM HOME: $91,725 over 1y, 42% of budgetSANCTUM HOUSE INC: $81,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetBECAUSE OF HIS LOVE OUTREACH: $80,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $76,219 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way for Southe…DTE Energy FoundationThe Skillman Foundati…Children's Hospital o…The Kresge FoundationFord PhilanthropyMichigan Health Endow…Comerica Charitable F…The Carls FoundationThe Ralph C Wilson Jr…The Jewish Fund
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI71.1× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Comerica Charitable Foundation · The Carls Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The Jewish Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Priority Health Total Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Priority Health Total Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Priority Health Total Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home