Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$387kHealth$144kEnvironment$139kArts & Culture$83kPhilanthropy$33kEducation$32kCivil Rights$23kRecreation & Sports$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARA LOS NINOS$50,000
VISION TO LEARN$10,000
SCPR$5,008
KCRW$5,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL (NRDC)$5,000
THE JEWISH FEDERATION$5,000
STUDENTS RUN LA$2,680
HOLA$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES (PPLA)$2,500
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA$2,500
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$2,500
COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL$1,037
REDISCOVER CENTER$1,033
THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP$1,033
KELLY BRUSH FOUNDATION$1,030
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $361k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ABILITY FIRST: $5k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $51k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $50k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $50k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $50k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $48k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $43k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $30k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $15k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $3k → 14%NEUROTALENT WORKS INC: $3k → 14%REDISCOVER CENTER: $1k → 14%HAND FOR HOPE: $2k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $9k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
VA
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 82% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 71%.

The Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$815k · 31 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
29

Total granted

$815k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+33%

Still filing today

58%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PARA LOS NINOS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $339k · revenue +64%
  • VISION TO LEARN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $108k · revenue +250%
  • KL
    KITTERY LAND TRUST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue ×14

Funded once

  • TF
    TEACH FOR AMERICA LA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CM
    COLLEGE MATCH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALING GARDEN
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
2
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
3
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
4
Partnership for Los Angeles Schools

We transform schools to revolutionize school systems, empowering all students with a high-quality education. the partnership's goals are to 1) dramatically accelerate achievement for students in the district's highest need and historically…

Education
5
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
8
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
9
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
10
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
11
La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc

La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.

—
12
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Para Los Ninos; the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
30/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARA LOS NINOS: $339,049 · Human ServicesPARA LOS NINOS+6 more: $22,266 · Human Services+6 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATION: $30,065 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYKCRW: $23,449 · OtherKCRWSCPR: $21,508 · OtherSCPRHOLA: $18,530 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,633 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $17,500 · OtherCHILDRENS BUREAU: $16,000 · OtherADL(THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE): $15,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $12,500 · OtherCOACHING CORPS: $12,500 · Other+28 more: $120,474 · Other+28 moreVISION TO LEARN: $107,500 · HealthVISION TO LEAR…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $12,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENT…VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $3,550 · HealthKITTERY LAND TRUST INC: $56,000 · EnvironmentKITTERY LA…YORK LAND TRUST: $22,500 · EnvironmentYORK LAND …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RE…COLLEGE MATCH: $10,000 · EducationOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $2,500 · EducationCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $1,037 · EducationLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $1,000 · EducationTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureDANCE AND DIALOGUE: $3,800 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educational Foundation: $3,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $2,500 · Arts & CultureHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $7,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $2,000 · InternationalKonbit Sante Cap Haitien Health: $500 · International
Human Services$361,315Other$350,159Health$128,550Environment$93,500Education$14,537Arts & Culture$14,300International$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $339,049 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $107,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKITTERY LAND TRUST INC: $56,000 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYORK LAND TRUST: $22,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHING CORPS: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAKING THE REINS: $8,750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYFIRST: $5,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRow LA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANCE AND DIALOGUE: $3,800 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $3,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $3,033 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $3,030 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEUROTALENT WORKS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS FOR HOPE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $1,037 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKonbit Sante Cap Haitien Health: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
  • Who funds KITTERY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds YORK LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COACHING CORPS ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE MATCH ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYFIRST ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Row LA ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION ↗
  • Who funds DANCE AND DIALOGUE ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS RUN AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA22.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ahmanson Foundation · La84 Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winebaum Family Foundation Fka Winebaum Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph