Loading…
Loading…
Virginia · Nonprofit
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY (Virginia) is funded by 2722 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,414,411,771 in grants to it, the largest being ANNE RAY FOUNDATION ($162,645,000). 1630 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$100k from 1 funders in 2026, up from $38M and 474 in 2017.
286 of 2722 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE NATURE CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 2722 funders by total. Association, not causation.
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 12% of grant income, and it takes 13 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 13 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 14% · 2018 15% · 2019 12% · 2020 18% · 2021 16% · 2022 14% · 2023 16% · 2024 16% · 2025 23% · 2026 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
43% of THE NATURE CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 51 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2722 funders put you well-backed among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $931.3M on record — $889.0M federal, $42.2M state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
67% of spending goes to programs.
95%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 57 states
Part of a family of 32 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 2722funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing